Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...Godcharles, Frederic Antes
History
Daily stories of Pennsylvania : $b prepared for publication in the leading daily newspapers of the state...
Godcharles, Frederic Antes
Pennsylvania -- Biography; Pennsylvania -- History
Fries was armed with a large horse pistol, and a man named Kuyder
assisted him in command. Learning that the marshal had taken a number of
prisoners, the rioters determined to rescue them. Fries drew up a paper
at his own house, setting forth their design, and the next morning more
than twenty followers appeared in arms. They then set out for Bethlehem
to release the prisoners. The marshal was intimidated and the imprisoned
rioters were released.
The Government became greatly alarmed at these proceedings. The
President issued a proclamation commanding rioters to disperse. He also
called upon the Governor and militia of Pennsylvania to assist in
maintaining order. Governor Mifflin issued a proclamation March 14,
1799, and on March 20 the cavalry from Philadelphia, Chester,
Montgomery, Bucks and Lancaster Counties was called out and encamped at
Springhouse, Montgomery County. Here General MacPherson issued a
proclamation to the rioters. Proceeding to Quakertown, the army began to
make arrests and to scour the country in search of rioters.
After releasing the prisoners at Bethlehem, Fries returned to his old
employment, but was arrested while holding a vendue. At the cry of the
soldiers he leaped to the ground and fled to a swamp. He was arrested
for treason, and with some thirty others taken to Philadelphia for
trial.
The case of Fries was called up in Federal Court at Philadelphia on
April 30, 1799. His lawyers were Alexander J. Dallas and Messrs. Ewing
and Lewis. Messrs. Rawle and Sitgrave were the counsel for the United
States. The verdict was guilty, but as it appeared after the verdict
that one of the jury, previous to being empaneled, had expressed the
opinion that Fries ought to be hanged, a new trial was granted. The
second trial was called April 29, 1800. At the former trial Fries’
lawyers argued at great length that the offense was only riot and not
treason. They cited many cases in support of their view. But the Court
relied upon the definition of treason in the Constitution.
Fries’ counsel then refused to appear further in the case. He was again
declared guilty, the Friday for the hanging was named and the sheriff’s
posse was selected.
The cause of Fries was espoused by the old Republican Party and by a
number of newspapers throughout the State. The Aurora denounced the
action of the officers and charged that the Army lived in free quarters
on the inhabitants. The Adler, a German paper published in Reading also
condemned the course of the Government and claimed that the troops
imposed upon the people as they marched through the country. Discussion
on the subject became so bitter that it entered into National and State
politics and became an important issue.
In the meantime National political affairs were so developing that
President Adams was led to pardon Fries.
----------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account