At first the heavenly bodies had been thought of as gods, then as
worlds like our own, then as spheres of ethereal fire. They were
swept round by a mighty wind, they ran on wheels, they floated in the
ether, they were set in crystal spheres; the controlling force was
the principle of number or harmony, an all-pervading World-Soul, a
host of immaterial intellectual Beings subject to one eternal First
Mover. It was also suggested that the greater part of the motions were
apparent only, that Earth was really in motion, spinning on her axis,
revolving round a Central Fire, or revolving round the Sun. But these
ideas had not enough evidence to support them when suggested. Had a
great imaginative thinker, a Pythagoras or an Aristarchus, arisen
after Ptolemy, he could have shown in detail how by assuming these
two motions the phenomena could be more simply accounted for, and he
could have made out a very good case for their probability.[57] But the
time was past then for such bold originality, and the explanation of
Aristotle was universally adopted. He, as we saw, placed the abode of
the gods, the rulers of the universe, beyond the outermost sphere, and
found the principle for which all were seeking, which should be the key
to all celestial motions, in the law of circular motion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[57] The changing latitudes of the planets, for instance, which gave
Ptolemy much trouble, are much more easily explained when it is granted
that they partly depend upon Earth’s motion in an orbit whose plane is
slightly inclined to the planes of their orbits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Greeks had at first thought that the earth was a disc, under a
tent-like sky; then it was a cylinder, with the sky in tiers above;
then a huge hemisphere filling half the universe. But they discovered
that it was a sphere, surrounded on every side by the heavens; and they
found its true size, and that the portion of it which was known to
them was less than a quarter of its whole extent. They explained the
marvel of Earth’s remaining unsupported in space by the known facts of
gravity, arguing that the falling of every particle of earth towards
Earth’s centre proved that it was also the centre of the Universe, and
that every heavy thing tended thither by a law of nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account