The book concludes: “Enough having now been said concerning the eclipses of sun and moon, by the goodness of God we have been enabled to bring this writing to an end; and for this _Deo Laus et Gloria_.” The time at which Alfraganus lived is not precisely known, but it seems to have been in the first half of the 9th century, since from internal evidence he wrote after, but probably not much after, the death of Al Mamun. His name indicates that he was a native of the beautiful and fertile country, shut in by lofty mountains, which lies on either side of the ancient river Jaxartes. He was surnamed the Calculator, and wrote on sun dials and the astrolabe, but we do not know of any observational work of his. Later Arab writers although they all continued to base their work on that of Ptolemy, improved on some of his estimates. Albategnius began his book “On the Number and Motions of the Stars” by saying that having studied Ptolemy’s _Syntax_ and mastered the Greek methods, and having noticed some errors in the positions of the stars, he felt impelled to add to Ptolemy’s observations, as the latter had added to those of Abrachis (Hipparchus), for it is not given to man to attain perfection. He gives a much more accurate value for precession than Alfraganus had done, who merely copied Ptolemy, for he makes it 54½ seconds yearly, or one degree in 66 instead of in 100 years. His tropical year, too, is only two minutes shorter than the modern value, so that he improved upon Hipparchus in this respect; and he made the discovery which Ptolemy missed, the motion of the sun’s apogee. He merely notes, however, that the position found by himself differed from that given in the _Almagest_, so it is doubtful whether he realized his discovery, or merely thought that a large error had been made. Although some of Ptolemy’s values were thus corrected by the Baghdad astronomers, no change was made in his theory of epicycles and eccentrics, which all accepted as having a concrete existence, partly because at first they did not distinguish between these and the spheres discussed by Aristotle, which he had described as formed of the same material as the planets. As Ptolemy does not explicitly state that his circles were only symbols, this is not surprising. They are formed, say the Arabs, of the fifth essence al-acir (the æther); and they conceived the epicycle as gliding over the outer surface of the deferent, like a small soap-bubble on the back of a big one. This notion, coupled with Ptolemy’s erroneous distance of the sun, misled them, as we have seen, into their imaginary discovery of planetary distances. [Sidenote: Tabit ben Korra 826-901.]