“Li quali, secondochè nel _Libro dell’ Aggregazione
delle Stelle_ epilogato si trova, dalla migliore dimostrazione
degli astrologi ....”
(_Conv._ II. vi. 133-136).
Although the usual name for the book of Alfraganus in Latin was
_Elementa Astronomica_, the version for which mediæval students
were indebted to the indefatigable translator Gerard of Cremona
bears in the MSS. the title _Alfragani liber de aggregationibus
Scientiæ Stellarum et de principiis cœlestium motuum_. It is this
book, therefore, that Dante means, though he has translated the title
somewhat inaccurately.[97]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[97] See Schiaparelli’s letter in Lubin’s _Dante e gli Astronomi
Italiani_. The name is, however, also used as a sub-title in the
printed edition of Christmann, Frankfort, 1590, which was based not
on the translation of Gerard but of Johannes Hispalensis of Seville;
and Toynbee thinks that this Frankfort edition represents most nearly
the version of Alfraganus used by Dante. It is the only one of the
five printed editions which gives the same figure for the diameter of
Mercury as that quoted by Dante. See Toynbee, “Dante’s Obligations to
Alfraganus” in _Romania_ xxiv. 95, and Moore, _Studies in Dante_ iii.
p. 3, _note_.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There were several other books known to Dante from which he must have
gleaned information about Ptolemy’s system, but Alfraganus we may
regard as his standard reference book. Many versions of Alfraganus are
still extant, and it is pleasant to feel that we can hold in our own
hands Dante’s text-book on astronomy. The best known is the printed
edition of Golius, published in Amsterdam in 1669: it is in both Latin
and Arabic, and opening in the middle we may turn the pages backwards
to see the beautiful Arabic letters of Alfraganus’ own language, which
is written from right to left, or forwards to look at the Latin in
which he became known to Dante.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account