Dante follows the classics and agrees with his contemporaries in
arranging the four elements in four spheres, which are below the
celestial spheres. The sphere of Fire is immediately within that of the
moon, below this comes Air, then Water, and lastly the solid sphere of
Earth. The contrast between Fire which constantly tends to rise towards
the moon, and Earth which sinks towards the centre of the universe, is
a favourite thought with him;[621] and lightning striking the earth
is described as fleeing its proper place.[622] Aristotle seems to
have regarded the four elements as flowing into one another, so that
these lowly spheres beneath the moon were not sharply divided, but his
mediæval disciples, following the Greek idea to its logical conclusion,
conceived them with boundaries as definite as those of the celestial
spheres. “Exhalations” could pass from one to another, but each
particle of every element tended always to revert to its own place,
which was distinct from the others.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[621] _Par._ i. 115, 117; _De Mon._ I. xv. 38-41; and III. vii. 30, 31,
etc.
[622] _Par._ i. 92, 130-134.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here they encountered a serious difficulty. If the sphere of water
is naturally higher than that of earth, how comes it that in one
quarter of the globe land rises above the ocean? It was recognised as
necessary that this should happen in some part of the world, in order
for an opportunity to be given for the elements to combine and to form
all those substances and all those living creatures, including man, for
which this earth was prepared; it was also agreed that the celestial
spheres were the agency by which the Creator had first chosen to “let
the dry land appear,” and by which it was maintained above the ocean;
but the exact nature of this force and the way in which it acted was a
question sometimes discussed. Albertus Magnus was of opinion that the
rays of the sun and the stars, which had more power in the temperate
and tropic zones than in the arctic, had here dried up the ocean, and
he quotes Albumassar’s statement that this proves the existence of land
on the southern side of the equator also. Ristoro, on the other hand,
believed that the waters had been drawn up and rolled back from the
habitable earth, and he attributes the elevating force to the stars of
the north, bringing in his favourite theory that in this hemisphere
they are far more numerous, and the constellations, from their upright
position, are far more powerful than in the south.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account