They did indeed represent very beautifully the celestial motions, and
also in a general way the variations in brightness or diameter, but
their unreality is betrayed by the fact that the latter was often
grossly exaggerated, as for instance with the moon, whose epicycle had
to be so large, in order to represent her motions, that at perigee
she ought to appear twice as large in diameter as at apogee! Ptolemy
can hardly have failed to notice this, though he does not mention it.
With regard to the planets, he is careful to tell us that he knows no
way of finding their real distances: the ratios of their epicycles
to their deferents he had carefully computed in each case, but to
estimate the diameters in stadia was utterly beyond his powers. He
believed, however, that all were very much nearer than the stars, and
more distant than the moon, and he found universal agreement among
astronomers in placing Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars, beyond the sun, in
order of the periods of their deferents, which were all longer than
a year. Venus and Mercury, however, had periods the same as the sun:
on which side of him, then, must they be placed? Some modern authors,
Ptolemy says, thought they were beyond the sun, but he agrees with
the most ancient, and places them between sun and moon. The general
disposition of the heavenly bodies according to Ptolemy is shown
in Fig. 35, with the periods of epicycles and deferents, and the
directions of the several movements, but epicycles and spaces between
deferents are all made equal. It will be noted that the sun has no
epicycle and that the moon turns on hers in a reverse direction, that
the centres of those of Mercury and Venus are in a line with the sun,
while the lines joining Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn to the centres of
theirs are in each case parallel with the line joining Earth and Sun.
Beyond all the wandering stars is the sphere of the fixed stars, moving
in its vast period of 36,000 years; and the whole system is carried
round Earth in one great revolution of a day and a night.
[Illustration: Fig. 35. The Ptolemaic system.
The arcs of circles are portions of the deferents which carry round the
smaller circles (the epicycles) in the periods named at the side.]
And here we have to note one astonishing fact. Although the planets
were all beyond reach of measurement, it was not so with the moon,
which the Greeks rightly recognized as our nearest neighbour. They had
actually achieved the long-desired feat of measuring her real size and
distance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account