Darkness and Dawn; Or, Scenes in the Days of Nero. An Historic TaleFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
History
Darkness and Dawn; Or, Scenes in the Days of Nero. An Historic Tale
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Rome -- History -- Nero, 54-68 -- Fiction
‘Well, Britannicus,’ said Pomponia, ‘I know something more about
these poor Christians than that. All these are lies. I dare say you
have read, or Sosibius has read to you, some of the writings of
Seneca?’
‘No,’ said Britannicus, reddening. ‘Seneca is my brother Nero’s
tutor. It is he, and Agrippina, and Pallas, who have done away with
the will of my father, Claudius. I don’t care to hear anything he
says. He is not a true philosopher, like Musonius or Cornutus. He
only writes fine things which he does not believe.’
‘A man may write very true things, Prince,’ said Pomponia, ‘yet not
live up to them. I have here some of his letters, which his friend
Lucilius has shown me. Let me read you a few passages.’
She took down the scroll of purple vellum, on which she had copied
some of the letters, and, unrolling it, read a sentence here and
there:--
‘“_God is near you, is with you, is within you. A sacred spirit
dwells within us, the observer and guardian of all our evil and our
good; there is no good man without God._”
‘“_What advantage is it that anything is hidden from man? Nothing is
closed to God._”
‘“_Even from a corner it is possible to spring up into heaven. Rise,
therefore, and form thyself into a fashion worthy of God._”
‘“_Do you wish to render the gods propitious? Be virtuous; to honour
them it is enough to imitate them._”
‘“_You must live for another, if you wish to live for yourself._”
‘“_In every good man, God dwells._”[21]
‘I could read you many more thoughts like these from Seneca’s
letters. Are they not true and beautiful?’
‘I wish his own acts were as true and beautiful,’ answered
Britannicus. ‘But what has this to do with the Christians?’
‘This: every one of those thoughts, and many much deeper, are
commonplaces among Christians; but the difference between them and
the worshippers of the gods is that they possess other truths which
make these _real_. They alone are innocent.’
‘And they do not worship an ass’s head? Well, at any rate, Christus
or Chrestus, whom they do worship, was crucified in Palestine by
Pontius Pilatus.’
‘And does suffering prevent a man from being divine? All Romans
worship Hercules, yet they believe, or profess to believe, that he
was burnt alive on Œta.’
Britannicus was silent, for he had always thought it a colossal
insanity on the part of the Christians to worship one who had been
crucified like a slave.
‘Tell me,’ said Pomponia, ‘when Epictetus reads you his notes of the
lectures of Musonius, does not the name of Socrates sometimes occur
in them?’
‘Yes,’ said the young prince; ‘it occurs constantly. Musonius talked
of Socrates as a perfect pattern, and all but divine.’
‘And how did Socrates die?’
‘He was poisoned by the Athenians with hemlock in their common
prison.’
‘As a malefactor?’
‘Yes.’
‘Does it, then, prove him to be worthless that he, too, died the
death of a felon? And are all philosophers fools for extending so
much reverence to a poisoned criminal?’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account