Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and UtilityRomanes, George John
Science
Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and Utility
Romanes, George John
Evolution (Biology); Heredity
"The cessation of selection when working alone (as it probably does
during the first centuries of its action upon structures or colours
which do not entail any danger to, or perceptible drain upon, the
nutritive resources of the organism) cannot cause degeneration
below, probably, some 10 to 20 per cent. But if from the first the
cessation of selection has been assisted by the _reversal_ of
selection (on account of the degenerating structure having
originally been of a size sufficient to entail a perceptible drain
on the nutritive resources of the organism, having now become a
source of danger, and so forth), the two principles acting together
will continue to reduce the ever-diminishing structure down to the
point at which its presence is no longer a perceptible disadvantage
to the species. When that point is reached, the reversal of
selection will terminate, and the cessation of selection will not
then be able of itself to reduce the organ through more than at
most a very few further percentages of its original size. But,
after this point has been reached, the now total absence of
selection, either for or against the organ, will sooner or later
entail this further and most important consequence, a failure of
heredity as regards the organ. So long as the organ was of use, its
efficiency was constantly _maintained_ by the _presence_ of
selection--which is merely another way of saying that selection was
constantly maintaining the force of heredity as regards that organ.
But as soon as the organ ceased to be of use, selection ceased to
maintain the force of heredity; and thus, sooner or later, that
force began to waver or fade. Now it is this wavering or fading of
the force of heredity, thus originally due to the cessation of
selection, that in turn co-operates with the still continued
cessation of selection in reducing the structure below the level
where its reduction was left by the actual reversal of selection.
So that from that level downwards the cessation of selection, and
the consequent failing of heredity, act and react in their common
work of causing obsolescence. In the case of newly added
characters, the force of heredity will be less than in that of more
anciently added characters; and thus we can understand the long
endurance of 'vestiges' characteristic of the higher taxonomic
divisions, as compared with those characteristic of the lower. But
in all cases, if time enough be allowed under the cessation of
selection, the force of heredity will eventually fall to zero, when
the hitherto obsolescent structure will finally become obsolete. In
cases of newly added and comparatively trivial characters, with
regard to which reversal of selection is not likely to take place
(e.g.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account