Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and UtilityRomanes, George John
Science
Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 2 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Heredity and Utility
Romanes, George John
Evolution (Biology); Heredity
"As our knowledge advances, very slight differences, considered by
systematists as of no importance in structure, are continually
found to be functionally important; and I have been especially
struck with this fact in the case of plants, to which my
observations have of late years been confined. Therefore it seems
to me rather rash to consider the slight differences between
representative species, for instance those inhabiting the different
islands of the same archipelago, as of no functional importance,
and as not in any way due to natural selection[153]."
[153] _Life and Letters_, vol. iii. p. 161.
Now, with regard to this passage it is to be observed, as already
remarked, that it refers to the formation of final judgements touching
_particular cases_: there is nothing to show that the writer is
contemplating _general principles_, or advocating on deductive grounds
the dogma that specific characters must be necessarily and universally
adaptive characters. Therefore, what he here says is neither more nor
less than I have said. For I have always held that it would be "rather
rash" to conclude that any given cases of apparent inutility are
certainly cases of real inutility, _merely on the ground that utility is
not perceived_. But this is clearly quite a distinct matter from
resisting the _a priori_ generalization that all cases of apparent
inutility must certainly be cases of real utility. And, I maintain, in
every part of his writings, without any exception, where Darwin alludes
to this matter of general principle, it is in terms which directly
contradict the deduction in question. As the whole of this Appendix has
been directed to proving that such is the case, it will now, I think, be
sufficient to supply but one further quotation, in order to show that
the above "latest expression of opinion," far from indicating that in
his later years Darwin "inclined" to Mr. Wallace's views upon this
matter, is quite compatible with a distinct "expression of opinion" to
the contrary, in a letter written less than six years before his death.
"In my opinion _the greatest error which I have committed_, has
been not allowing sufficient weight to the direct action of the
environment, i.e. food, climate, &c., _independently of natural
selection_. Modifications thus caused, _which are neither of
advantage nor disadvantage to the modified organisms_, would be
especially favoured, as I can now see chiefly through your
observations, _by isolation in a small area, where only a few
individuals lived under nearly uniform conditions_[154]."
[154] _Life and Letters_, vol. iii. p. 158.
I will now proceed to quote further passages from Darwin's works, which
appear to have escaped the notice of Mr. Wallace, inasmuch as they admit
of no doubt regarding the allusions being to _specific_ characters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account