Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 3 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Isolation and Physiological SelectionRomanes, George John
Science
Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 3 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Isolation and Physiological Selection
Romanes, George John
Evolution (Biology); Heredity
As I have excluded self-fertilization, it is necessary, if we are
to get any trustworthy results, that one should consider the mode
in which fertilization will be produced. I have taken the case of
fertilization by insects, and have assumed that each flower is
visited a certain number of times by insects during the period when
fertilization is possible; and, further, that the insects which
visit it have on the average visited a certain number of flowers of
the same species before they came there. Of course nothing but
observation can fix these latter numbers; but I should not be
surprised at finding that they are of considerable magnitude[65]. In
order to make the results a little more intelligible, I have
grouped them under the numbers which represent the average number
of flowers that an insect visits in a journey. This is a little
more than twice as great as the number which represents the number
of flowers he has on the average visited before coming to the
individual whose fertility we are considering.
[65] In this anticipation Mr. Moulton is right. The well-known
botanist, Mr. Bennett, read a most interesting paper on the subject
before the British Association in 1881. His results have since been
corroborated by other observers. In particular, Mr. R. M. Christy
has recorded the movements of 76 insects while visiting at least
2,400 flowers. (_Entomologist_, July 1883, and _Zool. Journal Lin.
Soc._, August 1883.) The following is an analysis of his results. In
the case of butterflies, in twelve observations on nearly as many
species, there are recorded altogether 99 visits to fifteen species
of flowers; and of these 99 visits 94 were constant to the same
species, leaving only 5 visits to any other, or second species. In
the case of the hive-bee, there were 8 individuals observed: these
visited altogether 258 flowers, and all the visits paid by the same
individual were paid to the same species in each of the eight cases.
Lastly, as regards bumble-bees, there were altogether observed 55
individuals belonging to four species. These paid altogether 1751
visits to 94 species of flowers. Of these 1751 visits, 1605 were
paid to one species, 131 to two species, 16 to three, 6 to four, and
1 to five. Adding all these results together, we find that 75
insects (butterflies and bees) visited 117 species of flowers: of
these visits, 1957 were constant to one species of flower; 136 were
paid also to a second species, 16 also to a third, 6 also to a
fourth, and 1 also to a fifth. Or, otherwise stated, while 1957 were
absolutely constant, from such absolute constancy there were only
159 deviations. Moreover, if we eliminate three individual humble
bees, which paid nearly an equal number of visits to two species
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account