Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
of nearly equal breadth, the one from a wild rabbit and the other from
a large domestic kind, the former was 3·15 and the latter 4·3 inches
in length. One of the most marked distinctions in different races of
men is that the skull in some is elongated, and in others rounded; and
here the explanation suggested by the case of the rabbits may hold
good; for Welcker finds that short “men incline more to brachycephaly,
and tall men to dolichocephaly”; and tall men may be compared with the
larger and longer-bodied rabbits, all of which have elongated skulls,
or are dolichocephalic.
From these several facts we can understand, to a certain extent, the
means by which the great size and more or less rounded form of the
skull have been acquired by man; and these are characters eminently
distinctive of him in comparison with the lower animals.
NAKEDNESS OF THE SKIN.
[Descent of
Man, page 56.]
Another most conspicuous difference between man and the lower animals
is the nakedness of the skin. Whales and porpoises (_Cetacea_),
dugongs (_Sirenia_), and the hippopotamus are naked; and this may
be advantageous to them for gliding through the water; nor would
it be injurious to them from the loss of warmth, as the species,
which inhabit the colder regions, are protected by a thick layer of
blubber, serving the same purpose as the fur of seals and otters.
Elephants and rhinoceroses are almost hairless; and, as certain extinct
species, which formerly lived under an Arctic climate, were covered
with long wool or hair, it would almost appear as if the existing
species of both genera had lost their hairy covering from exposure
to heat. This appears the more probable, as the elephants in India,
which live on elevated and cool districts, are more hairy than those
on the lowlands. May we then infer that man became divested of hair
from having aboriginally inhabited some tropical land? That the hair
is chiefly retained in the male sex on the chest and face, and in
both sexes at the junction of all four limbs with the trunk, favors
this inference--on the assumption that the hair was lost before man
became erect; for the parts which now retain most hair would then have
been most protected from the heat of the sun. The crown of the head,
however, offers a curious exception, for at all times it must have been
one of the most exposed parts, yet it is thickly clothed with hair. The
fact, however, that the other members of the order of _Primates_, to
which man belongs, although inhabiting various hot regions, are well
clothed with hair, generally thickest on the upper surface, is opposed
to the supposition that man became naked through the action of the sun.
* * * * *
[Descent of
Man, page 18.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account