Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
But this instinct retained by our chickens
has become useless under domestication, for the mother-hen has almost
lost by disuse the power of flight.
Hence, we may conclude that, under domestication, instincts have been
acquired, and natural instincts have been lost, partly by habit,
and partly by man selecting and accumulating, during successive
generations, peculiar mental habits and actions, which at first
appeared from what we must in our ignorance call an accident.
INNUMERABLE LINKS NECESSARILY LOST.
[Origin of
Species,
page 264.]
The main cause of innumerable intermediate links not now occurring
everywhere throughout nature depends on the very process of natural
selection, through which new varieties continually take the places of
and supplant their parent-forms. But just in proportion as this process
of extermination has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of
intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed, be truly enormous.
Why, then, is not every geological formation and every stratum full
of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any
such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most
obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory.
The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the
geological record.
In the first place, it should always be borne in mind what sort of
intermediate forms must, on the theory, have formerly existed. I have
found it difficult, when looking at any two species, to avoid picturing
to myself forms _directly_ intermediate between them. But this is a
wholly false view; we should always look for forms intermediate between
each species and a common but unknown progenitor; and the progenitor
will generally have differed in some respects from all its modified
descendants. To give a simple illustration: the fantail and pouter
pigeons are both descended from the rock-pigeon; if we possessed all
the intermediate varieties which have ever existed, we should have an
extremely close series between both and the rock-pigeon; but we should
have no varieties directly intermediate between the fantail and pouter;
none, for instance, combining a tail somewhat expanded with a crop
somewhat enlarged, the characteristic features of these two breeds.
These two breeds, moreover, have become so much modified, that, if we
had no historical or indirect evidence regarding their origin, it would
not have been possible to have determined, from a mere comparison of
their structure with that of the rock-pigeon, _C. livia_, whether they
had descended from this species or from some other allied form, such as
_C. oenas_.
* * * * *
[Page 265.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account