Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
In attempting to estimate the amount of structural difference
between allied domestic races, we are soon involved in doubt, from
not knowing whether they are descended from one or several parent
species. This point, if it could be cleared up, would be interesting;
if, for instance, it could be shown that the greyhound, bloodhound,
terrier, spaniel, and bull-dog, which we all know propagate their
kind truly, were the offspring of any single species. Then such facts
would have great weight in making us doubt about the immutability of
the many closely allied natural species--for instance, of the many
foxes--inhabiting different quarters of the world.
DESCENT OF THE DOMESTIC PIGEON.
[Origin of
Species,
page 17.]
Great as are the differences between the breeds of the pigeon, I am
fully convinced that the common opinion of naturalists is correct,
namely, that all are descended from the rock-pigeon (_Columba livia_),
including under this term several geographical races or sub-species,
which differ from each other in the most trifling respects. As several
of the reasons which have led me to this belief are in some degree
applicable in other cases, I will here briefly give them. If the
several breeds are not varieties, and have not proceeded from the
rock-pigeon, they must have descended from at least seven or eight
aboriginal stocks; for it is impossible to make the present domestic
breeds by the crossing of any lesser number: how, for instance,
could a pouter be produced by crossing two breeds unless one of the
parent-stocks possessed the characteristic enormous crop? The supposed
aboriginal stocks must all have been rock-pigeons--that is, they did
not breed or willingly perch on trees. But besides _C. livia_, with
its geographical sub-species, only two or three other species of
rock-pigeons are known, and these have not any of the characters of the
domestic breeds. Hence the supposed aboriginal stocks must either still
exist in the countries where they were originally domesticated, and yet
be unknown to ornithologists--and this, considering their size, habits,
and remarkable characters, seems improbable--or they must have become
extinct in the wild state. But birds breeding on precipices, and good
fliers, are unlikely to be exterminated; and the common rock-pigeon,
which has the same habits with the domestic breeds, has not been
exterminated even on several of the smaller British islets, or on the
shores of the Mediterranean. Hence the supposed extermination of so
many species having similar habits with the rock-pigeon seems a very
rash assumption. Moreover, the several above-named domesticated breeds
have been transported to all parts of the world, and therefore some of
them must have been carried back again into their native country; but
not one has become wild or feral, though the dovecot-pigeon, which is
the rock-pigeon in a very slightly altered state, has become feral in
several places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account