Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
Again, all recent experience shows that it is difficult
to get wild animals to breed freely under domestication; yet, on the
hypothesis of the multiple origin of our pigeons, it must be assumed
that at least seven or eight species were so thoroughly domesticated
in ancient times by half-civilized man as to be quite prolific under
confinement.
An argument of great weight, and applicable in several other cases,
is, that the above-specified breeds, though agreeing generally with
the wild rock-pigeon in constitution, habits, voice, coloring, and
in most parts of their structure, yet are certainly highly abnormal
in other parts; we may look in vain through the whole great family
of _Columbidæ_ for a beak like that of the English carrier, or
that of the short-faced tumbler, or barb; for reversed feathers
like those of the Jacobin; for a crop like that of the pouter; for
tail-feathers like those of the fantail. Hence it must be assumed not
only that half-civilized man succeeded in thoroughly domesticating
several species, but that he intentionally or by chance picked out
extraordinarily abnormal species; and, further, that these very species
have since all become extinct or unknown. So many strange contingencies
are improbable in the highest degree.
ORIGIN OF THE DOG.
[Animals and
Plants under
Domestication,
vol. i,
page 15.]
The first and chief point of interest in this chapter is, whether
the numerous domesticated varieties of the dog have descended from a
single wild species, or from several. Some authors believe that all
have descended from the wolf, or from the jackal, or from an unknown
and extinct species. Others again believe, and this of late has been
the favorite tenet, that they have descended from several species,
extinct and recent, more or less commingled together. We shall probably
never be able to ascertain their origin with certainty. Paleontology
does not throw much light on the question, owing, on the one hand, to
the close similarity of the skulls of extinct as well as living wolves
and jackals, and owing, on the other hand, to the great dissimilarity
of the skulls of the several breeds of the domestic dogs. It seems,
however, that remains have been found in the later tertiary deposits
more like those of a large dog than of a wolf, which favors the belief
of De Blainville that our dogs are the descendants of a single extinct
species. On the other hand, some authors go so far as to assert that
every chief domestic breed must have had its wild prototype. This
latter view is extremely improbable: it allows nothing for variation;
it passes over the almost monstrous character of some of the breeds;
and it almost necessarily assumes that a large number of species have
become extinct since man domesticated the dog; whereas we plainly see
that wild members of the dog-family are extirpated by human agency with
much difficulty; even so recently as 1710 the wolf existed in so small
an island as Ireland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account