Lady Emily was forced to confess that she had not been much interested in
the sermon. Mrs. Elton thought he spoke plainly, but there was not much of
the gospel in it. Mr. Arnold opined that people should not go to church to
hear sermons, but to make the responses; whoever read prayers, it made no
difference, for the prayers were the Church’s, not the parson’s; and for
the sermon, as long as it showed the uneducated how to be saved, and
taught them to do their duty in the station of life to which God had
called them, and so long as the parson preached neither Puseyism nor
Radicalism—(he frowned solemnly and disgustedly as he repeated the
word)—nor Radicalism, it was of comparatively little moment whether
he was a man of intellect or not, for he could not go wrong.
Little was said in reply to this, except something not very audible or
definite, by Mrs. Elton, about the necessity of faith. The conversation,
which took place at luncheon, flagged, and the visitors withdrew to their
respective rooms, to comfort themselves with their Daily Portions.
At dinner, Mr. Arnold, evidently believing he had made an impression by
his harangue of the morning, resumed the subject. Hugh was a little
surprised to find that he had, even of a negative sort, strong opinions on
the subject of religion.
“What do you think, then, Mrs. Elton, my dear madam, that a clergyman
ought to preach?”
“I think, Mr. Arnold, that he ought to preach salvation by faith in the
merits of the Saviour.”
“Oh! of course, of course. We shall not differ about that. Everybody
believes that.”
“I doubt it very much.—He ought, in order that men may believe, to
explain the divine plan, by which the demands of divine justice are
satisfied, and the punishment due to sin averted from the guilty, and laid
upon the innocent; that, by bearing our sins, he might make atonement to
the wrath of a justly offended God; and so—”
“Now, my dear madam, permit me to ask what right we, the subjects of a
Supreme Authority, have to inquire into the reasons of his doings? It
seems to me—I should be sorry to offend any one, but it seems to me
quite as presumptuous as the present arrogance of the lower classes in
interfering with government, and demanding a right to give their opinion,
forsooth, as to the laws by which they shall be governed; as if they were
capable of understanding the principles by which kings rule, and governors
decree justice.—I believe I quote Scripture.”
“Are we, then, to remain in utter ignorance of the divine character?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account