Day Symbols of the Maya Year: Sixteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1894-1895, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1897, pages 199-266.Thomas, Cyrus
Religion
Day Symbols of the Maya Year: Sixteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1894-1895, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1897, pages 199-266.
Thomas, Cyrus
Maya calendar
I think we may rest assured that the symbol of this day was derived from
the full face, and that the word (for face) it was intended to indicate
had _l_ as its chief phonetic element--possibly from _lec_, "brow,
front, forehead." If derived from the face, its use as a day symbol, and
in numerous combinations, proves beyond question that it is phonetic in
the true or in the rebus sense.
FOOTNOTES:
[205-1] Study of the Manuscript Troano, pref., p. viii.
[205-2] American Anthropologist, Washington, July, 1893.
[207-1] The plates are designated by Roman numerals, and the figures by
the Arabic numbers 1, 2, 3, etc. Hence LXIV, 1, signifies figure 1 of
plate LXIV; LXIV, 2, figure 2 of plate LXIV, etc.
[208-1] American Anthropologist, July, 1893, p. 254.
[208-2] There appears to be much confusion among writers who have referred
to this subject in regard to the "Black Deities" of the codices. Dr
Brinton's remarks on this subject in his late work, "A Primer of Mayan
Hieroglyphics," does not clear up the confusion. Apparently he has not
discovered that quite a number of these are merely black figures of
well-recognized deities not thus usually colored. It appears also, judging
by his statements, that Dr. Brinton has failed to identify the
characteristics by which the different deities of this class are to be
distinguished. Dr Schellhas, in his excellent paper "Die Gottergestallen
der Maya Handschriften," fails also to properly distinguish between these
deities. Dr Seler, whose profound studies have thrown much light on the
Maya hieroglyphs, fixes quite satisfactorily the characteristics of some
of these deities, yet he confounds others which should have been
separated.
[209-1] Dr Brinton (Primer of Mayan Hieroglyphics, p. 93) claims to have
discovered that this hitherto supposed "vessel" is, in reality, "a drum."
As the four (Cort. 27a) are without any accompaniments to indicate their
use as drums, and as each has above it one of the cardinal point signs,
there is nothing, unless it be the form, to lead to the supposition that
they are drums. In the same division of the two preceding and three
following pages we see vessels of different kinds represented. In the
lower divisions pages 29 and 30, are vessels somewhat of the same
elongate, cylindrical form, borne on the backs of individuals; and also in
the lower division of page 40 are four tall cylindrical vessels, in each
of which the arm of a deity figure is thrust. This section is copied in Dr
Brinton's work with the subscript "The beneficent gods draw from their
stores." Additional proof, if any is needed to show that these are
vessels, is found in the Tro. Codex. On plates 6* and 7* are tall
cylindrical vessels with the same inverted V marks on them; moreover, one
of them has the upper portion margined by the same tooth-like projection
as those in the Cortesian plate. That these are vessels of some kind is
apparent from the use the pictures show is made of them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account