Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
They entered without diplomatic negotiations between the United States
and Turkey. Not, indeed, till ten years after American missionaries had
begun work in Turkey was the first treaty between the United States and
that country concluded. Previous to that time the missionaries were
protected by England, which had treaties with the Ottoman government
conceding extra-territorial rights to all British subjects. The Sublime
Porte did not seem to recognize any difference between an English
subject and an American citizen for all were “Frank Christians” to him,
hence the protection afforded was ample.
It cannot be predicted as in the case of most countries how many and
what ordinary international rights will be conceded to foreigners
by the Ottoman government. Rights in Turkey are based not upon
any principle of international law usually prevailing between
Christian nations but upon special treaties which bear the name of
“Capitulations” and “Concessions.” Intercourse of the Christian world
with Mohammedan countries does not proceed according to the law of
nations. International law as practised by the civilized nations of
Christendom is an outgrowth from the communion of ideas existing
between them and rests upon a common conception of justice and right.
Between the Mohammedans and the Christian nations of Europe and America
there exists no such common idea or principle from which could result a
true international law. Relations one with the other have, therefore,
to be regulated by special “capitulation” or “concession” granted by
the ruler of the Mohammedan country.
For this reason, even to the present time, the law of nations as
known and practised throughout Christendom has not been applied in
the relations existing between Turkey and the Christian Powers. But
ever since the Sublime Porte, under stress of circumstances, began to
abandon most reluctantly and by slow degrees its ancient usages towards
other nations, and imperfectly to adopt those of Christendom, its rule
of international conduct has gradually approached that of Europe.
A capitulation on the part of the Turkish empire is regarded by the
sultan and his associates as a concession to foreigners, which they
have a right at any time to annul or destroy if, in their judgment,
such annulment or destruction is for their advantage. The sultan does
not wish to consider a capitulation as imposing a perpetual obligation
upon him or his officials. It is a privilege rendered foreign powers
which can be withdrawn without notice and without explanation. Only
in view of these facts can the treatment of missionaries and other
foreigners by the officials of Turkey be understood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account