Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
The official French paper, the _Journal de Constantinople_, in its
issue of August 4, 1864, published a leader supposed to emanate from
Ali Pasha, the grand vizier, in which the arrest of the Christian Turks
was charged to the alleged fact that the zeal of the missionaries
in making converts amounted to a “veritable war,” and that in this
work of proselyting seductive arts were employed. These charges were
investigated by the Minister of the United States, and by the British
ambassador, and not only were the missionaries exonerated from all
blame, but Earl Russell, the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
in Great Britain, strongly defended the missionaries and demanded
of Turkey that she maintain in her dealings with her subjects the
observance of the true principles of religious liberty. Upon the demand
of the English government the exiled Turks were permitted to return.
It was at once understood by the Moslems that for them there was no
liberty to change their faith. It is true that none were arrested upon
the open charge of changing their religion, but every conceivable
pretense was trumped up against them, to substantiate which any number
of Mohammedan witnesses could be procured, and the Christian Mohammedan
was sent into exile, languished in prison, or disappeared from view.
Frequently missionaries attempted to follow up a case of manifest
persecution, but they usually came upon a medical certificate that the
man had died in prison from fever or some other natural cause, or lost
all traces of the prisoner through frequent transfers to distant parts.
Some men are known to have been shot by their guard in the transfer.
In the Treaty of Berlin, entered into in 1878 by England, Austria,
Russia, France, Italy, and Turkey, Article 2 states that absolute
religious liberty is to exist in all the various territories mentioned
in the preceding article “including the whole Turkish empire.” The
sixty-second article begins, “The Sublime Porte, having expressed its
willingness to maintain the principle of religious liberty and to give
it the widest sphere, the contracting parties take cognizance of this
spontaneous declaration.” Then follow specifications of how the sultan
is to carry out these principles.
In spite of these reiterated declarations, it is evident that the
Turkish government does not and never did intend to acknowledge the
right of a Moslem to become a Christian. A high official once told
the writer that Turkey gives to all her subjects the widest religious
liberty. He said, “There is the fullest liberty for the Armenian
to become a Catholic, for the Greek to become an Armenian, for the
Catholic and Armenian to become Greeks, for any one of them to become
Protestant, or for all to become Mohammedans. There is the fullest and
completest religious liberty for all the subjects of this empire.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account