Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
In all cases where the word “Evangelical” is used in connection with
the Armenians, Greeks or Syrians it refers to those who are recognized
as regular readers of the New Testament in the vernacular. The
“Evangelicals” among the Armenians were those who persisted in adhering
to their right to read the New Testament and to follow its manifest
teachings even in the face of the disapproval of their ecclesiastics.
Under the fire of anathemas and persecution the word came to be applied
to those who were cast out of the Gregorian Church because they would
not discontinue the practise. In Turkey the word has only its original
meaning, derived from the “Evangel” of Christ.
In 1833 the missionaries at Constantinople were invited to be present
in the Patriarchal Church at the ordination of fifteen Armenian
priests, trained in Pashtimaljian’s school. These men were largely
emancipated from the superstitions of the old Church and alert to
the needs of radical reform. When the break between the Gregorians
and the Evangelicals actually took place, several years later, the
leaders of the Protestants were for the most part men who had received
their training under Pashtimaljian, who was always independent of
missionary supervision and who was highly esteemed and honored by the
ecclesiastics of the Gregorian Church.
With all these forces at work upon this able and alert people, advanced
ideas rapidly spread among all classes at the capital, and through
constant intercourse with the chief cities in the interior, aroused
there also the spirit of inquiry. The patriarch at Constantinople and
some of the bishops in interior towns seemed in hearty accord with
the revival of Biblical study and of true learning. The missionaries
endeavored to have the Armenians themselves open and conduct all the
schools, and ventured themselves to do anything of the kind only when
they failed to get the people to act.
The steady progress of the reform movement was hindered by great fires
in the city, by cholera and plague, and by civil war. Even to the
present these distracting and disintegrating forces have always been
present in some parts of the Turkish fields, presenting many obstacles
to continuous advance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account