Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
Most fortunately for them, at that time the sultan was at war with
Mohammed Ali of Egypt, and he called upon all the patriarchs to provide
him with recruits for his broken army. The defeat of the sultan, his
death, and the succession of his son, Abdul Medjid, with the loss of
the Turkish fleet, threw all into consternation and made the most
violent bigots forget for the moment to persecute. A fire in Pera which
destroyed between three thousand and four thousand Armenian houses
tended to produce a softening of heart against the persecuted.
While this condition of affairs prevailed at the capital the mission
was pushing its advanced posts into the interior of the country where
considerable numbers were found eager to procure copies of the Bible.
Ecclesiastical warnings sent from Constantinople to the Armenians
remote from the capital were given little heed. Violence had so
subsided at Constantinople that the evangelical movement again began to
accumulate momentum and force. A boarding-school for boys was opened
in November, 1840, at Bebek upon the Bosporus, some five miles above
Constantinople. This was under the superintendence of Cyrus Hamlin,
against whom and his school all the fury of the papists and the Greek
patriarch was directed, the Armenian patriarch refusing to join them.
The demand for books increased. By 1841 it was evident that a great
reform movement was in progress which was destined to spread over the
empire. Some of the leading persecutors were astute enough to see that
an invisible but irresistible force was moving the Armenian nation. The
spirit of reform swept over the country, awakening intellects, arousing
consciences, and demanding intellectual freedom.
This continued for five or six years, during which time there was
no separation of the “Evangelicals,” as they were called, from the
old Church. The missionaries always urged them to remain, exerting
their influence not against the Church but against its abuses and
superstitions. For the most part they attended public services in
the old Church, and were recognized as members in good standing. The
missionaries had no thought of changing these conditions, had they
imagined it was in their power to do so. Hitherto the movement had
been one towards reform within the Armenian Church and largely led by
Armenians who were themselves loyal members. In persecuting, the Church
was doing violence to its own.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account