Mother of the race of Æneas, voluptuous delight of gods and men,
sacred Aphrodite, who from the recesses of thy divine abode lookest
in pity upon the sorrowing generations of men and women, and sheddest
upon us rose-petals of subtle and recurrent pleasure and the delicious
gift of Sleep, do Thou, Goddess, be ever with us, and neglect not the
felicity of Thy worshippers. Do Thou, alone beautiful, daughter of the
Gods, drench us with loveliness.
* * * * *
From which to the lives of Pa and Ma Hartley _et al._, is indeed a
staggeringly long step....
* * * * *
I hold a brief for the war generation. J’aurais pu mourir; rien ne
m’eût été plus facile. J’ai encore à écrire ce que nous avons fait....
(Bonaparte à Fontainebleau—admirez l’érudition de l’auteur.)
* * * * *
Yet why should we mourn, O Zeus, and why should we laugh? Why weep,
why mock? What is a generation of men that we should mourn for it?
As leaves, as leaves, says the poet, spring, burgeon and fall the
generations of Man—No! but as rats in the rolling ship of the Earth as
she plunges through the roar of the stars to the inevitable doom. And
like rats we pullulate, and like rats we scramble for greasy prey, and
like rats we fight and murder our kin.... And—O gigantic mirth!—the
voice of the Thomiste is heard!
* * * * *
Peace be to you, O lovers, peace unto Juliet’s grave!
* * * * *
At the time of which I am writing—the three or four years preceding
1914—young men and women were just as much interested in sexual
matters as they are now, or were at any other time. They were in revolt
against the family or domestic den ethic, that “ordained for the
procreation of children” attitude whereby the State turns its adult
members into a true proletariat, mere producers of _proles_. And they
were almost as much in revolt against Tennysonian and Pre-Raphaelite
“idealism,” which made love a sort of hand-holding in the Hesperides.
But, let it be remembered, Freudianism (as distinct from Freud, that
great man whom every one talks about and nobody reads) had scarcely
begun to penetrate. All things were not interpreted in terms of sexual
symbolism; and if one had the misfortune to slip on a banana peel in
the street, he was not immediately told that this implied repressed
desire to undergo the initiatory mutilating rite of the Mohammedans.
They thought they were rediscovering the importance of the physical in
love; they hoped they were not neglecting the essential tenderness, and
the mythopœic faculty of lovers which is the source of much beauty.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account