The simple process of dissociating sex life from the philoprogenitive
instinct was performed by the War Generation—at least on the grand
scale, for isolated practitioners had long existed. The march of
Science (how delightful clichés are!) had brought certain engines
within the reach of all; and sensible people profited by them. The old
alternative of burning or marrying disappeared. And the following,
far better proposition arose. It was perfectly possible for man or
woman to live a satisfactory sex life without having children. Hence,
by the scientific process of trial and error, it became possible for
each to seek the really satisfactory lover; while those who were
philoprogenitively inclined might marry (en attendant mieux) for the
sake of the children. Thus there was a return to the wise promiscuity
of the Ancients (if the Ancients ever did anything so sensible, which I
greatly doubt) which was a great advance on humbug, domestic tyranny,
furtive promiscuity and whoring. One definite result, which we see
to-day, is an undeniable decline in the number of whores—the first
time this has occurred since the Edict of Milan.
Unfortunately the pre-war “engines” were rather crude and not wholly
reliable....
George and Elizabeth, then, were either extremely sensible or
disgustingly immoral—I don’t mind what your judgment is, I am
recording facts. I don’t, however, attempt to disguise my own
prejudice, which is that intelligence makes for a far better life than
“Luv” and “God,” those euphuisms for stupidity and ignorance. In a
manner of speaking they were pioneers. At any rate, they thought they
were, which is all that matters here. They really thought they had
worked out a more sensible, more intelligent, more humane relationship
between the sexes. But there were certain rather important little
snags they overlooked. Like most bright young things, they were very
cock-sure of themselves, a good bit too cock-sure. And then, while one
doesn’t at all deny that they were pretty bright, and on the right
track, their knowledge was unhappily theoretical, chiefly derived
from George’s reading and meditations. It’s a confoundedly dangerous
thing for two virgins to take on the job of initiating each other into
a complicated art they only know theoretically. Dangerous, in that
high hopes may be dashed, rather lovely emotions sadly frustrated and
a beautiful relationship spoiled. There are dangers in meeting the
undeniably right person too soon in life. Two handsome young married
people, obviously deeply in love—what a charming spectacle, how
delightful.... Wait! You wait! Not very long either....
* * * * *
You haven’t forgotten Fanny and the young man from Cambridge....
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account