Yet with all this colour the “feel” of the land was silvery-grey.
The thorn-bushes and the rare trees were bent at an angle under the
pressure of the South-West gales. The inland hamlets and farms huddled
down in the hollows behind a protecting wall of elms. They were humble,
unpretentious but authentic, like the lives of the shepherds and
ploughmen who lived in them. The three to ten miles which separated
them from the pretentious suburbanity of Martin’s Point might have
been three hundred, so unmoved, so untouched were they by its golf and
its idleness and tea-party scandals and even its increasing number of
“cars.” In hollows, too, crouched its low, flint-built Norman churches,
so unpretentious, for all the richness of dog-toothed porches and
Byzantine-looking tympanums and conventionalized satiric heads sneering
and gaping and grimacing from the string-courses. Hard satiric people
those Norman conquerors must have been—you can see the hard satiric
effigies of some of their descendants in the Temple Churche. They must
have crushed the Saxon shepherds and swineherds under their steel
gauntlets, smiling in a hard satiric way. And even their piety was hard
and satiric, if you can judge from the little flinty satiric churches
they scattered over the land. Then they must have pushed on westward to
richer lands, abandoning those barren downs and scanty fields to the
descendants of the oppressed Saxon. So the land seemed old; but the
hard satiric quality of the Normans only remained in odd nooks of their
churches—all the rest had grown gentle and silvery-grey, like a rather
sweet and gentle silvery-grey old lady.
* * * * *
All this George struggled to express with his
drawing-and-paint-blocks. He tried to absorb—and to some extent
did absorb—the peculiar quality of the country. He attempted it
all, from the twenty-mile sweeps of undulating Down fringed by the
grey-silver sea, to the church doors and little patient photographic,
semi-scientific painting of the flowers and butterflies. From the point
of view of a painter, he was always too literal, too topographical,
too minutely interested in detail. He saw the poetry of the land but
didn’t express it in form and colour. The old English landscape school
of 1770-1840 died long before Turner’s body reached St. Paul’s and
his money went into the pockets of the greedy English lawyers instead
of to the painters for whom he intended it. The impulse expired in
painstaking topography and sentimental prettiness. There wasn’t the
vitality, the capacity to struggle on, which you find in the best work
of painters like Friesz, Vlaminck and even Utrillo, who can find a new
sort of poetry in tossing trees or a white farmhouse or a _bistro_ in
the Paris suburbs. George, even at fifteen, knew what he wanted to say
in paint, but couldn’t say it. He could appreciate it in others, but he
hadn’t got the power of expression in him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account