English fiction -- 20th century; English poetry -- 20th century; Short stories, English; World War, 1914-1918 -- Fiction
“Oh, that was Howell, Padre. You mean when Diderot broke forth:
‘Richardson, thou singular genius’? He’d read it in the holidays
somewhere.”
“I _beg_ your pardon. Naturally, Taffy would read Diderot in the
holidays. Well, I’m sorry I can’t lick you for this; but if any one
ever finds out anything about it, you’ve only yourself to thank.”
Beetle went up to College and to the Outer Library, where he had
on tap the last of a book called _Elsie Venner_, by a man called
Oliver Wendell Holmes--all about a girl who was interestingly allied
to rattlesnakes. He finished what was left of her, and cast about
for more from the same hand, which he found on the same shelf, with
the trifling difference that the writer’s Christian name was now
Nathaniel, and he did not deal in snakes. The authorship of Shakespeare
was his theme--not that Shakespeare with whom King oppressed the
Army Class, but a low-born, poaching, ignorant, immoral village
lout who could not have written one line of any play ascribed to
him. (Beetle wondered what King would say to Nathaniel if ever they
met.) The real author was Francis Bacon, of Bacon’s Essays, which
did not strike Beetle as any improvement. He had “done” the essays
last term. But evidently Nathaniel’s views annoyed people, for the
margins of his book--it was second-hand, and the old label of a public
library still adhered--flamed with ribald, abusive, and contemptuous
comments by various hands. They ranged from “Rot!” “Rubbish!” and
such like to crisp counter-arguments. And several times some one
had written: “This beats Delia.” One copious annotator dissented,
saying: “Delia is supreme in this line,” “Delia beats this hollow.”
“See Delia’s Philosophy, page so and so.” Beetle grieved he could
not find anything about Delia (he had often heard King’s views on
lady-writers as a class) beyond a statement by Nathaniel, with
pencilled exclamation-points rocketting all round it that “Delia
Bacon discovered in Francis Bacon a good deal more than Macaulay.”
Taking it by and large, with the kind help of the marginal notes, it
appeared that Delia and Nathaniel between them had perpetrated every
conceivable outrage against the Head-God of King’s idolatry: and King
was particular about his idols. Without pronouncing on the merits
of the controversy, it occurred to Beetle that a well-mixed dose of
Nathaniel ought to work on King like a seidlitz powder. At this point
a pencil and a half sheet of impot-paper came into action, and he went
down to tea so swelled with Baconian heresies and blasphemies that he
could only stutter between mouthfuls. He returned to his labours after
the meal, and was visibly worse at prep.
“I say,” he began, “have you ever heard that Shakespeare never wrote
his own beastly plays?”
“’Fat lot of good to us!” said Stalky. “We’ve got to swot ’em up just
the same. Look here! This is for English parsin’ to-morrow. It’s _your_
biznai.” He read swiftly from the school _Lear_ (Act II., Sc. 2) thus:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account