Debs: His Life, Writings and Speeches, with a Department of AppreciationsDebs, Eugene V. (Eugene Victor)
History
Debs: His Life, Writings and Speeches, with a Department of Appreciations
Debs, Eugene V. (Eugene Victor)
Socialism -- United States; Socialist Party (U.S.)
IMPRISONED WITHOUT TRIAL.
If the crimes committed during the Chicago strike were chargeable to the
strikers, why were they not prosecuted? If not, why were they sentenced
to prison?
The fact that they were flung into prison without evidence and without
trial, and the fact that the Supreme Court affirmed the outrage, seemed
to afford Mr. Cleveland special satisfaction, and he accepts what he
calls the “concluding words” of the court as his own final vindication.
[Illustration:
DEBS’ FIRST GREETING BY THE COMMITTEE
]
JUDGE TRUMBULL’S OPINION.
The late Senator and Judge Lyman Trumbull, for many years United States
Senator, chairman of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Supreme Judge of
Illinois, author of the thirteenth amendment to the Constitution of the
United States, personal friend of Abraham Lincoln, and, above all, an
honest man, wrote: “The doctrine announced by the Supreme Court in the
Debs case places every citizen at the mercy of any prejudiced or
malicious Federal judge who may think proper to imprison him.”
President Cleveland doubtless understands the import of these ominous
words. Let the people, the working people, whom the ex-President regards
merely as a mob to be suppressed when they peaceably protest against
injustice—let them contemplate these words at their leisure.
When the strike was at its height and the railroads were defeated at
every turn, the Federal Court hastily impaneled a special grand jury to
indict the strikers. The foreman of this jury was chosen specially
because he was a violent union hater, and he afterward betrayed his own
capitalist colleagues in a matter they had entrusted to his integrity.
The jury was impaneled, not to investigate, but to indict.
A _Tribune_ reporter, who refused to verify a false interview before the
jury, and thereby perjure himself to incriminate the writer, was
discharged. The Chicago _Times_ published the particulars.
An indictment was speedily returned. “To the penitentiary,” was the cry
of the railroads and their henchmen. A trial jury was impaneled. Not a
juror was accepted who was of the same political party as the
defendants. Every possible effort was made to rush the strike leaders to
the State prison.
THE FAILURE OF THE PROSECUTION.
After all the evidence of the prosecution had been presented they
realized that they had miserably failed. Not one particle of
incriminating testimony could the railroads produce with all the sleuth
hounds they had at their command.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account