§ 801. It is plain that all truths cannot be established by
reasoning. For the attempt to do so would involve us in an infinite
regress, wherein the number of syllogisms required would increase at
each step in a geometrical ratio. To establish the premisses of a
given syllogism we should require two preceding syllogisms; to
establish their premisses, four; at the next step backwards, eight; at
the next, sixteen; and so on ad infinitum. Thus the very possibility
of reasoning implies truths that are known to us prior to all
reasoning; and, however long a train of reasoning may be, we must
ultimately come to truths which are either self-evident or are taken
for granted.
§ 802. Any syllogism which establishes one of the premisses of another
is called in reference to that other a Pro-syllogism, while a
syllogism which has for one of its premisses the conclusion of another
syllogism is called in reference to that other an Epi-syllogism.
_The Epicheirema_.
§ 803. The name Epicheirema is given to a syllogism with one or both
of its premisses supported by a reason. Thus the following is a
double epicheirema--
All B is A, for it is E.
All C is B, for it is F.
.'. All C is A.
All virtue is praiseworthy, for it promotes the general welfare.
Generosity is a virtue, for it prompts men to postpone self to others.
.'. Generosity is praiseworthy.
§ 804. An epicheirema is said to be of the first or second order
according as the major or minor premiss is thus supported. The double
epicheirema is a combination of the two orders.
§ 805. An epicheirema, it will be seen, consists of one syllogism
fully expressed together with one, or, it may be, two enthymemes (§
557). In the above instance, if the reasoning which supports the
premisses were set forth at full length, we should have, in place of
the enthymemes, the two following pro-syllogisms--
(i) All E is A.
All B is E.
.'. All B is A.
Whatever promotes the general welfare is praiseworthy.
Every virtue promotes the general welfare.
.'. Every virtue is praiseworthy.
(2) All F is B.
All C is F.
.'. All C is B.
Whatever prompts men to postpone self to others is a virtue.
Generosity prompts men to postpone self to others.
.'. Generosity is a virtue.
§ 806. The enthymemes in the instance above given are both of the
first order, having the major premiss suppressed. But there is
nothing to prevent one or both of them from being of the second
order--
All B is A, because all F is.
All C is B, because all F is.
.'. All C is A.
All Mahometans are fanatics, because all Monotheists are.
These men are Mahometans, because all Persians are.
.'. These men are fanatics.
Here it is the minor premiss in each syllogism that is suppressed,
namely,
(1) All Mahometans are Monotheists.
(2) These men are Persians.
_The Sorites_.
§ 807. The Sorites is the neatest and most compendious form that can
be assumed by a train of reasoning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account