Deficiency and Delinquency: An Interpretation of Mental TestingMiner, James Burt
Science
Deficiency and Delinquency: An Interpretation of Mental Testing
Miner, James Burt
Children with mental disabilities; Juvenile delinquents; Mentally ill offenders; Psychological tests
It is to be noted that, taken literally, the description of the American
Association is not in terms of the Binet scale, but of the mental
development of a normal child of twelve years, although the framers of
the resolution undoubtedly had the Binet scale of mental ages in mind.
It was soon found that the tests for the older ages in the Binet 1908
scale were too difficult for the places assigned them. This is certainly
true with the tests for twelve years and probably with those for eleven.
This evidence is assembled in Table IV. The combined results should be
used only with great caution since the methods of the investigators
differed in detail and the groups were differently chosen. In the groups
of children which Bobertag and Bloch and Preiss tested, there had been
eliminated some of those who were backward in school, while Goddard's
group did not include the best 12-year-olds.
TABLE IV.
RESULTS WITH THE BINET TESTS FOR MENTAL AGES XI AND XII
(_1908 Series_)
───────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬───────────────────────────
│No. of Cases │ Pass tests │ Pass tests XI or better
│ │XII or better│
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────────────────
│ Life-Age │ Life-Age │ Life-Ages
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┬─────────────
Investigators │ 12 11 │ 12 │ 11 │ 12
│ No. No. │ No. % │ No. % │ No. %
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────
Binet and Simon│ │ │ │
(School in poor│ │ │ │
quarter) │ │ │ │
1908 study │ 11 │ 2 18 │ │ 7 64
│ 20 │ │ 13 65 │
1911 study │ 23 │ │ │15[13] 65
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────
Bloch and │ 21 │ 21 100 │ │ 21 100
Preiss │ │ │ │
(Only pupils up│ 15 │ │ 13 87 │
to grade) │ │ │ │
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────
Bobertag │ 33 │ 19 57 │ │ 29 88
(Pupils │ 34 │ │ 18 53 │
averaged │ │ │ │
satisfactory) │ │ │ │
───────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────
Dougherty │ 46 │ 9 20 │ │ 36 78
(Includes 8th │ 44 │ │ 22 50 │
grade) │ │ │ │
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account