Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
While the tendency was all toward the cost-plus-fixed-profit form of
contract, when it came to the production of materials entirely new
and strange to our industry the War Department could not escape the
cost-plus-percentage form. The Government’s powder-bag-loading plants
were operating on the basis of the payment of operating costs, plus 14
per cent. Several of the shell-loading plants worked under contracts
providing for the payment of costs, plus 10 per cent. Silk cartridge
cloth was manufactured at cost, plus 10 per cent as profit. This
profit, as the skill of the cloth weavers increased, was gradually
stepped down to 3 per cent. The Modified Enfield rifles were made at
cost, plus 10 per cent. When the War Department commandeered plants, it
engaged operating companies to run them on a basis of costs paid, plus
a fixed monthly remuneration. Certain patriotic contractors built large
munitions plants for the Government at cost, plus the statutory $1 as
profit.
Then there was the combination contract, adopted for work new to our
industrial experience--a cost-plus form graduating into a fixed-profit
form as the actual work developed what the costs would be. The Browning
machine guns were produced under contracts of this sort.
Contracts for the production of aircraft were not brought under the
centralized administration of war department contracts. The aircraft
contracts provided for the payment of costs by the Government, plus
fixed profits, with bonuses for the producers if they kept under the
estimated costs.
CHAPTER IX
THE SETTLEMENT OF THE WAR CONTRACTS
In the preceding chapter we have been discussing chiefly the written,
formal contract, the tangible, visible document, duly signed and
witnessed, which could be submitted to any court as prima-facie
evidence of the obligations of both the producer and the Government.
If, however, the impression has been given that all the war business
was conducted under the authority of such instruments, let it now be
dispelled; because thousands of manufacturers did war work for the
Government, and the Government itself became involved for hundreds of
millions of dollars, under another set of arrangements, which became
known, after the armistice, as the informal, or “Bevo,” contracts.
These agreements, while embodying the same terms as those of the formal
contracts, were drawn with no such attention to the niceties of federal
procedure, without which the law says that a government contract is not
enforcible. The informal contracts were a product of the hurry and rush
to get things done. There were several sorts of them, some being formal
in type but defective in detail, others existing in written records,
such as correspondence, but not in formal contracts, and still others
being merely oral agreements between the producers and the agents of
the Government as to what work had to be done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account