Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
only a little rusting would destroy the fit of the contact surfaces
and ruin the unassembled jackets and hoops, and therefore the company
was instructed to assemble these otherwise perishable elements before
stopping the work. After the shrinking, all uncompleted pieces were
slushed in grease, packed for protection, and stored away, to be used,
according to the plan, in the manufacture which will be necessary in
the peace-time maintenance of the artillery equipment. Some of the
incomplete Bullard tubes of the 155’s were later transferred to the
Watervliet Arsenal and finished with the machinery there. The arsenal
completed 300 guns of this size after the armistice.
This, essentially, so far as the partially finished units were
concerned, was the procedure followed by the Ordnance Department in all
nineteen emergency gun plants. Although the mills turning out rough
forgings for the gun plants were taken from this branch of war work
immediately after the armistice, the Ordnance Department reserved and
stored a supply of forgings in order to keep the future gun plants in
operation until new forging mills can come into production.
Seventeen of the emergency gun plants were closed out altogether after
the armistice. Two remain among the war assets of the United States,
held “in ordinary,” as the phrase goes, meaning that they are closed,
but ready with machinery and materials in all stages of completion to
start up in full operation as soon as the workmen can be recruited
and the fires started. These two additions to our arsenal system were
named the Rochester Gun Plant and the Erie Howitzer Plant; and at these
two plants and at the government arsenals the Ordnance Department
concentrated the great equipment of machinery, tools, plans, and
materials left on its hands after the dissolution of the gunmaking
industry created by the war, all stored so systematically that the War
Department, at any time for years to come, can, in theory, at any rate,
quickly reëstablish a gun industry on the scale known in 1918. Recently
it has been proposed to transfer the facilities at Rochester to some
other place.
The existence of this manufacturing equipment in the possession of
the Ordnance Department gives the United States a stronger military
potentiality than the nation ever possessed before. For the first time
in our history the Government itself during peace is in possession of
extensive facilities for the manufacture of light and medium-heavy
artillery. Before the war the Army procured all its field guns (and
those only in negligible quantities) principally from private makers.
Its two gunmaking arsenals, Watertown and Watervliet, turned out
principally large guns for fixed mounting at the coastal forts. Before
showing what was done at the Rochester and Erie plants, it is worth
while pausing to note the legacy received from the war industry of
1917–1918 by the two established gunmaking arsenals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account