Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Miles of docks, hundreds of acres of covered storage, hundreds of
power plants and complete water systems, thousands of miles of roads,
railroads, water mains, and sewer lines--the list grows monotonous
simply because of the size of its items, which are not to be visualized
by stating them in terms of acres and miles. The activity was at its
height at the signing of the armistice, when it became incumbent upon
the Construction Division to terminate the work.
Four hundred and fifty army construction projects were under way on the
day of the armistice. One hundred and thirty-one stood completed. The
incomplete projects included some of the largest and costliest ones.
But the salvage value of buildings is small unless they can be sold to
purchasers able to make use of them as and where they stand. Few war
buildings were adapted to civilian use. They were highly specialized
for a purely war use, and they were not often located where they could
be of economic benefit to the country. A large part of their cost
represented the evanescent element of labor, a value entirely destroyed
when buildings are wrecked for the sake of salvaging their materials.
The war plant, even incomplete, represented an immense investment,
but one which would be almost altogether lost if the plant were to
be knocked down for salvage. Therefore it was of advantage to the
Government to carry on a surprisingly large amount of war construction
after the armistice for the sake of getting the use-value from its
investment by occupying these installations with the permanent Army.
But there were other reasons for continuing work. Among the largest
and costliest of the construction projects were those which provided
the ocean terminal bases at Boston, Brooklyn, Philadelphia, Norfolk,
Charleston, and New Orleans. These installations were all of durable,
fireproof construction; and, with their piers, their great warehouses
equipped with labor-saving machinery, trackage, and the like, they were
the last word of modern constructional science in developments of this
sort. In appropriating the money for these port works, Congress had
stipulated that after the war they should be used in the development
of American foreign trade. Consequently the Construction Division went
ahead after the armistice and finished up these buildings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account