Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Then the war ended. About 24,000,000 francs had been invested at
Châteauroux. The British had spent £3,000,000 in the manufacture
of components and the Americans a like sum, expressed in dollars.
France had not put in a centime; yet she had expected to receive
nine-sixteenths of the first year’s output. The question was, what
share of the heavy loss should France stand? The French arrangement
with the Tank Commission was tantamount to a contract, with the
British-American partnership standing in the light of contractor.
It was evident, then, that the French were morally bound to pay
cancellation charges--to stand part of the loss, in other words. The
British and American negotiators at London thought it would be about
right if France would pay back the 24,000,000 francs expended by the
British and Americans at Châteauroux, and the British and Americans
would throw in the tank plant itself as an inducement.
Then the question arose, how would this 24,000,000 francs be
divided? Both England and America had lost heavily in the big-tank
enterprise--each had, in fact, agreed to let these losses balance
each other; neither was to bill the other for anything in the
settlement--and here seemed to be the chance to get some of the money
back. Naturally, the Americans assumed that the French reimbursement
would be divided equally, since both America and England had
contributed equally to the cost of the Châteauroux plant. But no, the
British contended; since they had surrendered their share of the first
year’s production of tanks, the lion’s share of the reimbursement
should go to them. There was logic in this, but, without deciding the
point, both sides repaired to Paris to present their joint tank claim
to the French; and then it appeared that the British and Americans had
been dividing some French chickens before they were hatched. Through
M. Louis Loucheur, the Minister of Munitions, the French Government
metaphorically lifted its eyebrows in surprise that its associates
could present such a claim. To be sure, the French expected to take
the Anglo-American heavy tanks, but so did the Americans and British
expect to receive light tanks from the French industry. These were
merely understandings, not formal contracts; and the French, to do
their share, had made large expenditures in developing the light-tank
manufacture for the benefit of all. Needless to say, the French
Government had lost heavily in terminating its tank industry. These
national losses should set off each other....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account