Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predestForsyth, J. S.
History
Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predest
Forsyth, J. S.
Demonology; Superstition; Witchcraft
The following scarce, curious, and learned document, long since out of
print, forms a postscript written by Dr. More, who, it appears,
strenuously advocated the existence of preternatural agencies, against
the opinion of many eminent men, who wrote, at that time, on the same
subject; and however much the belief in witches, &c. may have been
depreciated of later years, we will venture to say that few of the
present day, layman or divine, could take up his pen, and offer so
learned a refutation against, as Dr. More has here done in support of
his opinions founded on Scripture.
“This letter lying by me some time before I thought it opportune to
convey it, and in the meanwhile meeting more than once with those that
seemed to have some opinion of Mr. Webster’s criticisms and
interpretations of Scripture, as if he had quitted himself so well
there, that no proof thence can hereafter be expected of the being of a
witch, which is the scope that he earnestly aims at; and I reflecting
upon that passage in my letter, which does not stick to condemn
Webster’s whole book for a weak and impertinent piece, presently thought
fit, (that you might not think that censure over-rash or unjust) it
being an endless task to shew all the weakness and impertinencies of his
discourse, briefly by way of _Postscript_, to hint the weakness and
impertinency of this part which is counted the master-piece of the work,
that thereby you may perceive that my judgment has not been at all rash
touching the whole.
“And in order to this, we are first to take notice what is the real
scope of his book; which if you peruse, you shall certainly find to be
this: That the parties ordinarily deemed witches and wizzards, are only
knaves and queans, to use his phrase, and arrant cheats, or deep
melancholists; but have no more to do with any evil spirit or devil, or
the devil with them, than he has with other sinners or wicked men, or
they with the devil. And secondly, we are impartially to define what is
the true notion of a witch or wizzard, which is necessary for the
detecting of Webster’s impertinencies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account