Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predestForsyth, J. S.
History
Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predest
Forsyth, J. S.
Demonology; Superstition; Witchcraft
“‘And he said unto her, what form is he of? and she said, an old man
cometh up, and is covered with a mantle.’ He asks here in the singular
number, because, his mind was only fixt on Samuel. And the woman’s
answer is exactly according to what the spirit appeared to her, when her
eye was upon it, _viz._ איש זקן עלה ‘an old man coming up;’ for he was
but coming up when she looked upon him, and accordingly describes him:
For עלה there, is a particle of the present tense, and the woman
describes Saul from his age, habit, and motion he was in, while her eye
was upon him. So that the genuine and grammatical sense in this answer
to ‘what form is he of?’ is this, an old man coming up, and the same
covered with a mantle, this is his form and condition I saw him in.
Wherefore Saul being so much concerned herein, either the woman or he
changing their postures or standings, or Samuel by this having
sufficiently conspissated his vehicle, and fitted it to Saul’s sight
also, it follows in the text: ‘And Saul perceived it was Samuel, and he
stooped with his face to the ground and bowed himself.’
“O the impudent profaneness and sottishness of perverse shufflers and
whifflers! that upon the hearing of this passage can have the face to
deny that Saul saw any thing, and meerly because the word ‘perceived’ is
used, and not ‘saw,’ when the word ‘perceived,’ plainly implies that he
saw Samuel, and something more, namely, that by his former familiar
converse with him, he was assured it was he. So exquisitely did he
appear, and over-comingly to his senses, that he could not but
acknowledge (for so the Hebrew word ידע signifies) that it was he, or
else why did he stoop with his face to the very ground to do him honour?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account