"There is not one Lord for bishops and another for civil rulers;
both are vicegerents of the same Lord and both must render an
account to him. The office of the Christian prince is not to
excel others in wealth, but, as far as possible, to seek the
advantage of all. Turn not what belongs to the public to your
own profit, but spend whatever is yours, even yourself, for the
public good. The people owe much to you, but you owe everything
to them. High-sounding names, '_Invictus_,' '_Sacrosanctus_,'
'_Majestas_,' though your ears are forced to hear them, yet
ascribe them all to Christ, to whom alone they belong. The
crime of _læsæ majestatis_, which others bring forward with
frightful clamour,--let this be to you a very small matter. He
alone violates the majesty of the prince who, under the name
of a prince, does things contrary to law, cruel, violent, or
criminal. Let no attack move you so little as one which touches
you personally. Remember that you are a public person, and that
it is your duty to think only of the public good. If you are
wise consider, not how great you are, but how great a burden
rests upon your shoulders. The greater danger you are in, so
much the less seek indulgence for yourself, and choose the model
for your administration, not from your fathers or from your
partisans, but from Christ. What can be more absurd than that a
Christian prince should set up Hannibal, Alexander, Cæsar, or
Pompey as an example to himself?... Nothing is so becoming, so
splendid, so glorious in kings as to attain as nearly as may be
to the perfect likeness of Jesus, the supreme king, greatest
and best.... '_Apostolus_,' '_Pastor_,' '_Episcopus_,' these are
names of duties, not of government; '_Papa_,' '_Abbas_,' are
titles of love, not of dominion. But why should I go into this
ocean of vulgar errors?"
The Enchiridion closes with five chapters of remedies against
certain vices: lust, avarice, ambition, arrogance, and anger. These
prescriptions have to us so obvious a sound that one easily overlooks
their real importance. Their value consists in this: that in an age
of formal righteousness they direct the conscience of the individual
man straight back to the sources of all Christian living, to the
plain teaching of Jesus and the plain argument of common sense. We
ought to follow Scripture,--yes, but because Solomon kept a harem
of concubines, that is no example for us. Peter denied the Christ
for whom he afterward died; but that is no excuse for perjury. The
Christian law is thus made plain to the individual conscience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account