Despotism and Democracy: A Study in Washington Society and PoliticsSeawell, Molly Elliot
General
Despotism and Democracy: A Study in Washington Society and Politics
Seawell, Molly Elliot
Political fiction; Washington (D.C.) -- Fiction
“Yes,” replied Crane, “we are established for the season”--and he gave
the name of a comfortable, but not expensive or fashionable, apartment
house where they had quarters.
“And say to her that, although I can’t give her a dinner half so good
as what she gave me, I shall expect her and you to arrange to dine with
me at my house at a very early day. Good morning.”
Crane escaped and went to his seat in the House. While he was
contemplating the baseness of his own conduct, Thorndyke came over and
spoke to him.
Thorndyke’s first impression of Crane was that he looked haggard and
worn, and Crane’s impression of Thorndyke was that he had grown about
ten years younger. His greeting to Thorndyke was very cordial, but he
was conscious of a strange thing--that ever since his bargain with
Sanders, the meeting with former friends, men of sterling probity,
gave him a vague uneasiness. It seemed to him as if, in duping Senator
Bicknell, he was duping every honest man he knew. Thorndyke, too, asked
after Mrs. Crane, and it began to dawn upon Crane’s mind that Annette
had the power, in a remarkable degree, of pleasing men of the world.
Still, he thought her not quite good enough for himself, particularly
if the brilliant future he planned should materialise--as it must and
should.
The proceedings of the day were perfunctory, and it was but little
after three o’clock when Thorndyke left the House. The afternoon was
briskly cold, and the sun glittered from a heaven as blue as June. Just
as Thorndyke came out on the plaza he encountered Crane, who would have
avoided him, but it was scarcely possible.
The two men walked down the hill, and toward Thorndyke’s old quarters.
They talked amicably and even intimately, but Thorndyke got a curious
impression of reserve from Crane--and reserve was the last thing in the
world to develop in Julian Crane. As they walked along the streets in
the dazzling sun of December in Washington, they were speaking of the
great economic questions with which the Congress would have to deal.
Thorndyke, as an accomplished lawyer, saw certain difficulties in the
way of regulating these matters which Crane did not at first perceive.
“After all,” said Thorndyke, “it comes down to whether either political
party will deal honestly with these questions. If they do, a solution
will be found, and the whole matter can, in the course of a few years,
be properly adjusted.”
“What do you call perfect honesty in politics?” asked Crane, after a
moment.
“That’s rather a large proposition,” replied Thorndyke, laughing.
“I should say, if called upon to give an immediate definition, that
perfect honesty in politics means keeping one’s hands clean in money
matters, and being an outspoken friend or enemy.”
Crane’s heart sank at this. He did not know why he should have asked
such a question, and he was hard hit by Thorndyke’s reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account