Devereux — CompleteLytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
History
Devereux — Complete
Lytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
Great Britain -- History -- Anne, 1702-1714 -- Fiction
Then for the first time, but not till the weary brethren had at this
favourable symptom permitted themselves to return for a brief interval
to the monastery, to seek refreshment for themselves and to bring down
new medicines for the patient,--then, for the first time, I rose from
the Hermit’s couch by which I had hitherto kept watch, and repairing to
the outer chamber, took forth the packet superscribed with my name.
There, alone in that gray vault, and by the sepulchral light of the
single lamp, I read what follows:--
THE HERMIT’S MANUSCRIPT.
Morton Devereux, if ever this reach you, read it, shudder, and, whatever
your afflictions, bless God that you are not as I am. Do you remember
my prevailing characteristic as a boy? No, you do not. You will say
“devotion!” It was not! “Gentleness.” It was not: it was JEALOUSY! Now
does the truth flash on you? Yes, that was the disease that was in my
blood, and in my heart, and through whose ghastly medium every living
object was beheld. Did I love you? Yes, I loved you,--ay, almost with
a love equal to your own. I loved my mother; I loved Gerald; I loved
Montreuil. It was a part of my nature to love, and I did not resist the
impulse. You I loved better than all; but I was jealous of each. If my
mother caressed you or Gerald, if you opened your heart to either, it
stung me to the quick. I it was who said to my mother, “Caress him not,
or I shall think you love him better than me.” I it was who widened,
from my veriest childhood, the breach between Gerald and yourself. I
it was who gave to the childish reproach a venom, and to the childish
quarrel a barb. Was this love? Yes, it was love; but I could not endure
that ye should love one another as ye loved me. It delighted me when
one confided to my ear a complaint against the other, and said, “Aubrey,
this blow could not have come from thee!”
Montreuil early perceived my bias of temper: he might have corrected it
and with ease. I was not evil in disposition; I was insensible of my own
vice. Had its malignity been revealed to me, I should have recoiled in
horror. Montreuil had a vast power over me; he could mould me at his
will. Montreuil, I repeat, might have saved me, and thyself, and a third
being, better and purer than either of us was, even in our cradles.
Montreuil did not: he had an object to serve, and he sacrificed our
whole house to it. He found me one day weeping over a dog that I had
killed. “Why did you destroy it?” he said; and I answered, “Because it
loved Morton better than me!” And the priest said, “Thou didst right,
Aubrey!” Yes, from that time he took advantage of my infirmity, and
could rouse or calm all my passions in proportion as he irritated or
soothed it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account