Dialogues of the DeadLyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Philosophy
Dialogues of the Dead
Lyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Dialogues, English -- Early works to 1800; Imaginary conversations
_Darteneuf_.--Of singing birds! Choke him! I never ate but one, which I
stole out of its cage from a lady of my acquaintance, and all London was
in an uproar, as if I had stolen and roasted an only child. But, upon
recollection, I doubt whether I have really so much cause to envy AEsopus.
For the singing bird which I ate was not so good as a wheat-ear or
becafigue. And therefore I suspect that all the luxury you have bragged
of was nothing but vanity. It was like the foolish extravagance of the
son of AEsopus, who dissolved pearls in vinegar and drank them at supper.
I will stake my credit that a haunch of good buck venison and my
favourite ham pie were much better dishes than any at the table of
Vitellius himself. It does not appear that you ancients ever had any
good soups, without which a man of taste cannot possibly dine. The
rabbits in Italy are detestable. But what is better than the wing of one
of our English wild rabbits? I have been told you had no turkeys. The
mutton in Italy is ill-flavoured. And as for your boars roasted whole,
they were only fit to be served up at a corporation feast or election
dinner. A small barbecued hog is worth a hundred of them. And a good
collar of Canterbury or Shrewsbury brawn is a much better dish.
_Apicius_.--If you had some meats that we wanted, yet our cookery must
have been greatly superior to yours. Our cooks were so excellent that
they could give to hog's flesh the taste of all other meats.
_Darteneuf_.--I should never have endured their imitations. You might as
easily have imposed on a good connoisseur in painting the copy of a fine
picture for the original. Our cooks, on the contrary, give to all other
meats, and even to some kinds of fish, a rich flavour of bacon without
destroying that which makes the distinction of one from another. It does
not appear to me that essence of hams was ever known to the ancients. We
have a hundred ragouts, the composition of which surpasses all
description. Had yours been as good, you could not have lain indolently
lolling upon couches while you were eating. They would have made you sit
up and mind your business. Then you had a strange custom of hearing
things read to you while you were at supper. This demonstrates that you
were not so well entertained as we are with our meat. When I was at
table, I neither heard, nor saw, nor spoke; I only tasted. But the worst
of all is that, in the utmost perfection of your luxury, you had no wine
to be named with claret, Burgundy, champagne, old hock, or Tokay. You
boasted much of your Falernum, but I have tasted the Lachrymae Christi
and other wines of that coast, not one of which would I have drunk above
a glass or two of if you would have given me the Kingdom of Naples. I
have read that you boiled your wines and mixed water with them, which is
sufficient evidence that in themselves they were not fit to drink.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account