Diderot and the Encyclopædists (Vol. 2 of 2)Morley, John
Philosophy
Diderot and the Encyclopædists (Vol. 2 of 2)
Morley, John
Diderot, Denis, 1713-1784; Encyclopedists
I do not rate these originals very highly. Other people make
familiar acquaintances, and even friends, of them. They detain me
perhaps once in a twelvemonth, if I happen to fall in with them.
Their character stands out from the rest of the world, and breaks
that wearisome uniformity which our bringing-up, our social
conventions, and our arbitrary fashions have introduced. If one of
them makes his appearance in a company, he is a piece of leaven
which ferments and restores to each a portion of his natural
individuality. He stirs people up, moves them, invites to praise or
blame; he is the means of bringing out the truth, he gives honest
people a chance of showing themselves, he unmasks the rogues; this
is the time when a man of sense listens, and distinguishes his
company.
I had known my present man long ago. He used to frequent a house to
which his clever parts had opened the door. There was an only
daughter. He swore to the father and mother that he would marry
their daughter. They shrugged their shoulders, laughed in his face,
told him he was out of his senses, and I saw in an instant that his
business was done. He wanted to borrow a few crowns from me, which
I gave him. He worked his way, I cannot tell how, into some houses
where he had his plate laid for him, but on condition that he
should never open his lips without leave. He held his tongue and
ate away in a towering rage: it was excellent to watch him in this
state of constraint. If he could not resist breaking the treaty,
and ever began to open his mouth, at the first word all the guests
called out _Rameau!_ Then fury sparkled in his eyes, and he turned
to his plate in a worse passion than ever. You were curious to know
the man's name, and now you know it: 'tis Rameau, pupil of the
famous man who delivered us from the plain-song that we had been
used to chant for over a hundred years; who wrote so many
unintelligible visions and apocalyptic truths on the theory of
music, of which neither he nor anybody else understood a word; and
from whom we have a certain number of operas that are not without
harmony, refrains, random notions, uproar, triumphs, glories,
murmurs, breathless victories, and dance-tunes that will last to
all eternity; and who, after burying Lulli, the Florentine, will be
himself buried by the Italian virtuosi,--a fate that he had a
presentiment of, which made him gloomy and chagrined; for nobody is
in such ill-humour, not even a pretty woman who awakes with a
pimple on her nose, as an author threatened with loss of his
reputation.
He comes up to me. Ah, ah! here you are, my philosopher! And what
are you doing among this pack of idlers? Can it be possible that
you too waste your time in pushing the wood?...
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account