Diderot and the Encyclopædists (Vol. 2 of 2)Morley, John
Philosophy
Diderot and the Encyclopædists (Vol. 2 of 2)
Morley, John
Diderot, Denis, 1713-1784; Encyclopedists
_I._--Gently, good man. Now I will not take your uncle Rameau for
an instance; he is harsh, he is brutal, he has no humanity, he is a
miser, he is a bad father, bad husband, bad uncle; but it has never
been settled that he is particularly clever, that he has advanced
his art, or that there will be any talk of his works ten years
hence. But Racine, now? He at any rate had genius, and did not pass
for too good a man. And Voltaire?
_He._--Beware of pressing me, for I am not one to shrink from
conclusions.
_I._--Which of the two would you prefer; that he should have been a
worthy soul, identified with his till, like Briasson, or with his
yard measure, like Barbier, each year producing a lawful babe, good
husband, good father, good uncle, good neighbour, decent trader,
but nothing more; or that he should have been treacherous,
ambitious, envious, spiteful, but the author of _Andromaque_,
_Britannicus_, _Iphigenie_, _Phedre_, _Athalie_?
_He._--For his own sake, on my word, perhaps of the two men it
would have been a great deal better that he should have been the
first.
_I._--That is even infinitely more true than you think.
_He._--Ah, there you are, you others! If we say anything good and
to the purpose, 'tis like madmen or creatures inspired, by a
hazard; it is only you wise people who know what you mean. Yes, my
philosopher, I know what I mean as well as you do.
_I._--Let us see. Now why did you say that of him?
_He._--Because all the fine things he did never brought him twenty
thousand francs, and if he had been a silk merchant in the Rue
Saint Denis or Saint Honore, a good wholesale grocer, an apothecary
with plenty of customers, he would have amassed an immense fortune,
and in amassing it, he could have enjoyed every pleasure in life;
he would have thrown a pistole from time to time to a poor devil of
a droll like me; we should have had good dinners at his house,
played high play, drunk first-rate wines, first-rate liqueurs,
first-rate coffee, had glorious excursions into the country. Now
you see I know what I meant. You laugh? But let me go on. It would
have been better for everybody about him.
_I._--No doubt it would, provided that he had not put to unworthy
use what gain he had made in lawful commerce, and had banished from
his house all those gamesters, all those parasites, all those idle
flatterers, all those depraved ne'er-do-wells, and had bidden his
shop-boys give a sound beating to the officious creature who offers
to play pander.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account