Diego Collado's Grammar of the Japanese LanguageCollado, Diego
History
Diego Collado's Grammar of the Japanese Language
Collado, Diego
Japanese language -- Grammar
[11] See p. 14, under _Dos nomes adiectivos_, where the initial distinction
is drawn between nominal and verbal adjectives.
[12] Rodriguez does not treat the substantive verb in _Arte Breve_, but
refers the reader to his earlier work for its description.
[13] _Verbo pessoal_ as contrasted with _verbo substantivo_ and _verbo
adjectivo_.
[14] Rodriguez defines this term elsewhere (_Arte_, 56) as the vowels, _A_,
_I_, _V_, _Ye_, _Vo_, in that order. See also the introduction to the
_Vocabulario_.
[15] This term, not found in the _Arte_, is applied to the entire complex
of "spelling" rules which Rodriguez introduces into his description. While
no clear-cut influences can be established, it is generally held by Doi and
others that these rules are based upon _Kanazukai no chikamichi_ or some
similar work. See _Kokugogaku taikei_, Vol. 9 (Tokyo, 1964), pp. 69-77.
[16] Latin _liquesco_, "to become fluid, or melt." Used here as a term to
describe the palatal and labial series.
[17] This last phrase is to be understood in the context of the following
passages which deal with euphonic change in the absence of a devise,
_nigori ten_, to show voicing.
[18] Rodriguez used _Vma_ regularly in the _Arte_, but notes the variant
_Muma_ on 178v.
[19] Presumably a reference to such variants as _Samurô_ for _Saburô_.
[20] _Liurinho_, presumably a treatise such as the _Kanazukai no
chikamichi_, by Ichijō Kanera.
[21] In this passage Rodriguez is suggesting that certain European
grammarians, out of ignorance of native grammatical theory, have
misinterpreted the formational rules; and that, perhaps for pedogogical
convenience, he has retained some of these "unnatural" rules in his
description.
[22] Read _Taxxi_.
[23] Read _tatesai_. The punctuation _Tateyo_. _Tatei_, _tatesai_, is in
all likelihood a typesetter's error for _Tateyo_, _tatei_, _tatesai_.
[24] The conjugational display (27v) lists _motomuruni_ and
_motomurutocoroni_.
[25] Rodriguez is here confusing the usage of the classical particle _ran,
ramu_ with the construction _te + ara + mu_.
[26] In the conjugational charts we find:
_motomeô_ }
_motometarǒ_ } _toki_
_motomeôzuru_ }
[27] The following notes are necessary to correct the printer's errors that
occur in this listing:
a. In the perfect conditional of _Vabi_ read _bitaraba_ for _bitaraaba_.
b. The form _Fitobi_ should in all likelihood read _Fotobi_ 'to be wet.'
c. The forms _Fotobi_, _Fokorobi_, and _Fusabi_ are all given present
indicatives in _bu_. There seems to be no reason for the ending appropriate
to the classical _shūshikei_ to be used for these particular verbs and the
_bu_ is taken as a misprint of _buru_. The _Arte_ (28) lists these forms as
regular.
d. In the perfect conditional of _Mochiy_ read _ytaraba_ for _yttaraba_.
e. The form _Coru_ should read _Cori_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account