Dilemmas of Pride, (Vol 1 of 3)Loudon, Mrs. (Margracia)
General
Dilemmas of Pride, (Vol 1 of 3)
Loudon, Mrs. (Margracia)
Fiction
The old feudal system itself was better than this: the ancient baron was
at least bound to feed not only his relations but his vassals, and he
did so in his own hall, at his own table. While, now-a-days, a man, as
soon as his father's funeral is over, turns his brothers and sisters out
of doors, to exist as they may, on a pitiful portion, the principal of
which is in general infinitely less than one year's income of the
property, on the scale of which they have been accustomed to live in
their father's time; while the new master permits his servants to
collect their wages by showing the empty baronial hall to strangers at
so much per head, by which creditable means he is himself enabled to
reserve all his rents to stake at hazard in London, or at _rouge et
noir_ in Paris. When parliament is sitting, he must of course attend, to
vote against any infringement on his monopoly, which the enlightened
spirit of the times may chance to propose. Thanks, however, to the
Reform Bill, the holders of the monopolies are no longer our sole
law-givers; we have now some _chance_ of justice _one time or another_.
"Besides," he added, "to return to the ancient baron, he was not only
bound to feed his retainers, but in time of war to provide the
government with a certain number of them, fitly clothed and armed;
which was virtually bearing the burdens of the state. The baron was, in
point of fact, but the trustee to a certain property, which property was
to feed a certain number of the population, and to contribute its due
proportion to the defence of the community. Instead of this, when the
feudal system becomes dangerous to government the barons are forbidden
to arm, and exonerated from feeding their retainers; yet, the
trust-property left in their hands for _pocket-money_, while their late
followers are not only turned out on the wide world to starve, but the
taxes necessary to maintain the army which the barons are forbid to
provide, are levied on the _bare palms_ of the _hands_ of the thus
turned out and starving vassals; and not satisfied with this injustice,
those who thus keep possession of the trust-lands, have arrived at
literally billeting their younger sons on those said vassals, thus
turned out and starving."
"Explain! explain!" cried Lord Darlingford, "How can you make that out?"
"Are not," replied Henry, "the salaries and pensions of all the posts
and sinecures they hold paid by means of taxes, a great proportion of
which are levied on industry? Is this as it should be? If the _pride_ of
the great demand that their properties shall be inherited by their elder
sons, and the offspring of that _pride_--if _false necessity_, require
that places and sinecures be provided for their younger sons, should not
the _rich co-operate_ in raising a fund for the payment of the salaries
of such, and not grind their thousands by pittances from the _real
necessities_ of the _poor_?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account