Discourses on Satire and on Epic PoetryDryden, John
History
Discourses on Satire and on Epic Poetry
Dryden, John
Epic poetry; Satire; Satire -- History and criticism
But the argument of the work (that is to say, its principal action), the
economy and disposition of it—these are the things which distinguish
copies from originals. The Poet who borrows nothing from others is yet
to be born; he and the Jews’ Messias will come together. There are parts
of the “Æneis” which resemble some parts both of the “Ilias” and of the
“Odysses;” as, for example, Æneas descended into hell, and Ulysses had
been there before him; Æneas loved Dido, and Ulysses loved Calypso: in
few words, Virgil hath imitated Homer’s “Odysses” in his first six books,
and in his six last the “Ilias.” But from hence can we infer that the
two poets write the same history? Is there no invention in some other
parts of Virgil’s “Æneis?” The disposition of so many various matters,
is not that his own? From what book of Homer had Virgil his episode of
Nysus and Euryalus, of Mezentius and Lausus? From whence did he borrow
his design of bringing Æneas into Italy? of establishing the Roman Empire
on the foundations of a Trojan colony? to say nothing of the honour he
did his patron, not only in his descent from Venus, but in making him so
like her in his best features that the goddess might have mistaken
Augustus for her son. He had indeed the story from common fame, as Homer
had his from the Egyptian priestess. _Æneadum genetriæ_ was no more
unknown to Lucretius than to him; but Lucretius taught him not to form
his hero, to give him piety or valour for his manners—and both in so
eminent a degree that, having done what was possible for man to save his
king and country, his mother was forced to appear to him and restrain his
fury, which hurried him to death in their revenge. But the poet made his
piety more successful; he brought off his father and his son; and his
gods witnessed to his devotion by putting themselves under his
protection, to be replaced by him in their promised Italy. Neither the
invention nor the conduct of this great action were owing to Homer or any
other poet; it is one thing to copy, and another thing to imitate from
nature. The copier is that servile imitator to whom Horace gives no
better a name than that of animal; he will not so much as allow him to be
a man. Raffaelle imitated nature; they who copy one of Raffaelle’s
pieces, imitate but him, for his work is their original. They translate
him, as I do Virgil; and fall as short of him as I of Virgil. There is a
kind of invention in the imitation of Raffaelle; for though the thing was
in nature, yet the idea of it was his own. Ulysses travelled, so did
Æneas; but neither of them were the first travellers: for Cain went into
the land of Nod before they were born, and neither of the poets ever
heard of such a man. If Ulysses had been killed at Troy, yet Æneas must
have gone to sea, or he could never have arrived in Italy; but the
designs of the two poets were as different as the courses of their
heroes—one went home, and the other sought a home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account