Discourses on Satire and on Epic PoetryDryden, John
History
Discourses on Satire and on Epic Poetry
Dryden, John
Epic poetry; Satire; Satire -- History and criticism
“In these two books of satire it is the business of Horace to
instruct us how to combat our vices, to regulate our passions, to
follow nature, to give bounds to our desires, to distinguish betwixt
truth and falsehood, and betwixt our conceptions of things and things
themselves; to come back from our prejudicate opinions, to understand
exactly the principles and motives of all our actions; and to avoid
the ridicule into which all men necessarily fall who are intoxicated
with those notions which they have received from their masters, and
which they obstinately retain without examining whether or no they be
founded on right reason.
“In a word, he labours to render us happy in relation to ourselves;
agreeable and faithful to our friends; and discreet, serviceable, and
well-bred in relation to those with whom we are obliged to live and
to converse. To make his figures intelligible, to conduct his
readers through the labyrinth of some perplexed sentence or obscure
parenthesis, is no great matter; and, as Epictetus says, there is
nothing of beauty in all this, or what is worthy of a prudent man.
The principal business, and which is of most importance to us, is to
show the use, the reason, and the proof of his precepts.
“They who endeavour not to correct themselves according to so exact a
model are just like the patients who have open before them a book of
admirable receipts for their diseases, and please themselves with
reading it without comprehending the nature of the remedies or how to
apply them to their cure.”
Let Horace go off with these encomiums, which he has so well deserved.
To conclude the contention betwixt our three poets I will use the words
of Virgil in his fifth Æneid, where Æneas proposes the rewards of the
foot-race to the three first who should reach the goal:—
“_Tres præmia primi_ . . .
_Accipient_, _flauâque caput nectentur olivâ_.”
Let these three ancients be preferred to all the moderns as first
arriving at the goal; let them all be crowned as victors with the wreath
that properly belongs to satire. But after that, with this distinction
amongst themselves:—
“_Primus equum phaleris insignem victor habeto_.”
Let Juvenal ride first in triumph.
“_Alter Amazoniam pharetram_, _plenamque sagittis_
_Threiciis_, _lato quam circumplectitur auro_
_Balteus_, _et tereti subnectit fibula gemmâ_.”
Let Horace, who is the second (and but just the second), carry off the
quiver and the arrows as the badges of his satire, and the golden belt
and the diamond button.
“_Tertius Argolico hoc clypeo contentus abito_.”
And let Persius, the last of the first three worthies, be contented with
this Grecian shield, and with victory—not only over all the Grecians, who
were ignorant of the Roman satire—but over all the moderns in succeeding
ages, excepting Boileau and your lordship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account