Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
The nature of inflammations of the nasopharynx suggests at once that
there may be some anatomical reason for their distribution and
character. A general review of the anatomy of the mammalian and avian
nasopharynx reveals the relatively greater space in the former,
especially in the passage from the nose to the pharynx, and emphasizes
the exposure of the opening of the upper larynx in the bird, lying as it
does in the posterior part of the tongue and surrounded by the
constrictores glottidis. A dissection of the accessory nasal sinuses
exposes the relatively large size of these spaces in the lower mammals,
and the capacious openings into the nasal cavities.[20] In the Primates
and Lemures the anatomy more closely resembles that of man, the sinuses
being relatively smaller and the communicating passages narrower. In the
bird on the other hand, while the sinuses may be extensive in some they
are usually small, yet in all the communication with the turbinate area
is by a narrower slit or tortuous canal, frequently, as in Galli,
running from below upward into the maxillary sinuses. The extent of the
turbinate and the richness in mucosa is probably greater in all mammals
than in birds; certainly this seems true of Carnivora and Ungulata
_versus_ Accipitres and Galli.
If the seriousness of a rhinitis be dependent upon the extent of
involvement of the sinuses and the blocking up of their outlets it would
be expected that the variety of animal having the smallest drainage
channels would show the greatest evidence of these diseases. Our records
would indicate that 32 birds (.96 per cent. of the autopsies upon Aves)
had rhinitis whereas only 7 mammals (.39 per cent. of autopsies on this
class) presented the condition. Extension to the sinuses occurred in
only one-third of each of these figures, a complication which in turn
produced generalized infection more often in mammals than in birds as 4
is to 3. These figures are perhaps too small for conclusions but it
would seem that rhinitis occurs more often in birds with their small
sinuses and channels while sinusitis and general infection occur more
often in mammals with their large sinuses and extensive turbinate
apparatus. The most conspicuous orders represented are, in line of
numbers Anseres 12, Psittaci 7, Accipitres 5, Carnivora 3. Nine of the
twelve waterfowl were part of an epizoötic which will be discussed under
specific diseases.
Bacteriologically the mammalian cases that have been worked out were due
to _Streptococcus pyogenes_ in several instances, including the
generalized cases, and to a mixture of streptococci, golden
staphylococci and members of the colon-aerogenes group. In one case in a
tapir a member of the B. septicus group was found. Moulds were
discovered in three avian cases and filaria in one. No pentastomum or
œstrus has been discovered. In thirteen instances the lungs have been
involved, apparently secondary to the nasopharyngeal disease.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account