Pneumonia as a clinical disease is a relatively uncommon, although quite serious sporadic condition in animals. However accompanying the specific, more or less epizoötic diseases such as influenza, distemper and the choleras it may be a frequent and quite pronounced complicating feature of the case. Pneumonia _per se_ has exacted a reasonable toll in this Garden but unfortunately recognition being impracticable, diagnosis and treatment have not progressed. Nor has it been practicable to group our cases pathologically because of the lack of history and the difficulty of making bacteriological observations at many autopsies. Fortunately we have had practically no epizoötic pneumonias, an experience shared with other gardens judging by their published reports. Etiologically, and of course this applies to non-verminous, non-mycotic and non-tuberculous cases, the pneumococcus has stood out prominently as a cause with a few additional cases due to the streptococcus and the Bact. aerogenes mucosum group; London reports four cases in monkeys due to the Friedlander bacillus. Some time ago Doctor Weidman subjected our pneumonias to an analysis and was able to show that there is no parallelism between the seasonal incidence of pneumonia in man and animals, rather indeed that the Garden is more apt to have a greater number of cases in the summer, a sort of “closed season” for man. This I am inclined to interpret as connected with the larger number of visitors during that season. Doctor Weidman was further able to show that the only real examples of lobar fibrinous pneumonia strictly comparable to the human infection occurred in the Primates. I have uncovered one in a lemur and one in a carnivore. The pneumococcus has been far and away the greatest producer of our pneumonias, in two typed cases being of the IV variety. There will be given below a summary of the pathological types of pneumonia encountered, to be followed by some notes upon the principal gross and minute anatomy in special orders. Table 9 will show the numerical distribution of types among the orders. All the principal mammalian orders are represented while the birds seem relatively less susceptible to the disease and, except the Passeres, show a trifling incidence.