Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
The portion of the anatomy that we now approach varies in construction
almost as much through the animal kingdom as do the external shape and
covering of the various orders and much more than do the other systems.
The reason for this is obvious, an arrangement accommodative to the
differing food chiefly, but not a little to the ease with which animals
obtain and assimilate their nutriment. It would be impracticable to
describe all the variations of the orders discussed in this study, but
since certain gross and minute differences are of importance in
comparative pathology they will be discussed at the appropriate places.
It is my purpose to present in a subsequent section a discussion of food
in captivity from the standpoint of its quality and quantity in relation
to pathology.
Doubtless the quality of food is the largest factor in the production of
disease both of the alimentary tract and elsewhere, but I am not at all
sure that the quantity may not be equally important, in certain groups
at least. Thus, for example, the ungulate has nearly always available in
bedding a substance that he can and will eat, and the prevalent idea
that an animal will eat only as much as is good for him seems not to
hold at all times, since overfilled rumens are only too common. It might
be thought, however, that captivity creates a sort of pica, or that
enforced idleness is conducive to gorging. The use a few lines above of
the word “doubtless” may have arrested the attention of some, yet when
the whole subject is reviewed it seems entirely justified. Plimmer puts
incorrect food at the head of the list of the causes of enteritis,
Brooks emphasizes the importance of certain grasses and musty fodder,
systematic writers detail among the principal causes of gastritis
spoiled food, and in zoological gardens specific disease like hog
cholera and enterohepatitis are relatively uncommon while nonspecific
gastroenteritis is the most frequent diagnosis in causes of death.
The other factors to which enteritis is ascribed are animal and
vegetable parasites and mechanically operative foreign bodies, the last
being unimportant. Just how important the first mentioned are is a
matter of some question which must be subjected to considerable study
before any solution can be expected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account