Hemorrhages into the kidney are found in acute infections and certain diseases like leucemia; they are of little moment. Perirenal hemorrhage is a somewhat striking and unusual affair. Recently I saw at a human autopsy of a young subject a subcapsular hemorrhage from the renal substance probably due to vascular rupture in an acute nephritis; there was no history of injury. There have been three cases of subcapsular hemorrhage in our records and as two of them represented the immediate cause of death, are interesting enough to record. An armadillo suffered an acute diffuse nephritis with much congestion but not enough to call it hemorrhagic. There was a large hemorrhage around the left organ, probably from a vessel near the hilum, sufficient to compress the kidney and cause it to atrophy. A lion presented an acute vegetative endocarditis with all its usual complications. The right renal capsule was distended with recent clot to a size which reached to the pelvic brim. Presumably an embolism caused thrombosis, ulceration and rupture of some middle size vessel. A dormouse suffering with an acute general infection probably emanating from the intestine, had several small recent clots separating the kidney from its capsule. NEPHRITIS. Nephritis, whether one begin its conception with the clinicopathological picture originally given by Bright, with the purely pathological classification of Weigert and Virchow or the modern tendency to subordinate all physical changes to clinical phenomena, is nevertheless a process of degeneration and inflammation affecting the secreting and supporting structures of the kidney and leading to some degree of impaired function. The disease is bilateral in so nearly every case that for practical purposes unilateral cases may be ignored. This implies that for some reason the renal tissues are generally susceptible to etiological agents so that when one side is affected its fellow seems always to participate or to follow. It seems desirable in studying nephritis to evaluate fully the mutual relations of functionating and supporting tissues and of the various sections of the first named. It is taught in many places that inflammations of one or another of these parts may occur independently, as for example a tubular nephritis, a glomerulonephritis and an interstitial nephritis. If however one reflect upon the dependence of the tubular function upon the glomerulus and _vice versa_ or upon the effect of inflammatory exudates in the supporting tissues upon the blood supply of the tubule, it becomes evident that only the most trivial or evanescent pathological changes in one can be without effect upon the others. It is difficult to see how, for examples, a glomerulus could remain normal if its associated tubule were destroyed or how if round cell infiltration or pus surround a capsule for any length of time, this structure could fail to be doomed. All this is by way of directing attention to the progress of physical