Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
Analysis of the associated pathology will reveal that among the mammals,
renal disease, chronic infections and diseases of the thoracic serosa
are most often responsible for hypertrophy, and that something over one-
third of the hearts showed myocardial damage. Among the Aves
arteriosclerosis and renal disease are most important in enlarging the
heart; half of the cases had myocarditis. In so far as dilatation in
mammals is concerned, renal disease and acute infections are decidedly
more important than other influences, even than the next in order—
chronic infections and pulmonary diseases; only one-fifth of the cases
had myocardial disease. Acute infectious disease is the most potent
cause of dilatation in birds; only two of the eight cases had
degeneration of the heart muscle.
COMPARISON OF MAMMALIA AND AVES.
If a comparison of the incidence of increased muscle bulk in the two
classes be made[9] it will be found to occur two and one-half times more
often in mammals, while dilatation occurs nearly ten times more often
among the mammals than among the birds. Hypertrophy is accompanied by
myocardial change in 44 per cent. of the cases, whereas muscular
degeneration was only seen in 24 per cent. of the dilatations; this
change is conspicuously lacking in the Primates, Ungulates and
Marsupials. The usual teaching has been that dilatation, which means
enlargement of chambers and thinning of walls or at least no thickening
thereof, implied an inability on the part of the heart to keep up with
increased demand—a decompensation. If Starling be correct that
dilatation is not a degeneration of pump value but merely one of
adaptations to increased demand, then this method is more characteristic
of mammals than of birds. There is, however, the reserve power to
increase the muscle bulk inherent in the mammalian, not possessed or
needed by the avian heart. The large-hearted class Aves certainly dilate
their blood pump less frequently than mammals and indeed have less
cardiac disease.
An analysis of the incidence of hypertrophy _versus_ dilatation shows
that hypertrophying power resides in the Primates, Accipitres and
Struthiones, their hearts relatively seldom dilatating. Lack of such
power and consequent dilatation resides in Rodentia, Ungulata,
Marsupialia and Anseres. Hypertrophying power lies therefore chiefly in
the heart of average size for its class, dilatation occurring in the
small heart. (See page 63.)
AVIAN HYPERTROPHY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account