Diseases of cattle, sheep, goats and swineMoussu, G. (Gustave)
Science
Diseases of cattle, sheep, goats and swine
Moussu, G. (Gustave)
Veterinary medicine
Rough manipulation with improvised sounds may tear, fissure, or
perforate the muscular and mucous coats, producing the gravest
consequences.
IV. =Crushing.= The crushing of an obstruction in the cervical region
was long ago suggested, and is still greatly commended by empirics and
farriers. It is performed by means of a little mallet and a piece of
board. The method is barbarous, and exposes the animal to such grave
complications as crushing of the œsophageal walls, followed by necrosis,
laceration of the connective tissue, and interstitial hæmorrhage,
injuries of the superficial or deep-seated jugulars, of the carotid
artery, pneumo-gastric nerve, etc. It should never be practised, even
although attempts have been made to improve it by replacing the mallet
and board by specially formed forceps intended for crushing potatoes or
roots. Only in the rare cases where one is certain that the foreign body
consists of a very ripe fruit could crushing be justified, and in this
case there is no need to have recourse to special instruments, for the
hands alone suffice.
=Injection of alkaloids.= The practitioner occasionally finds himself in
the embarrassing position of having vainly tried all the above methods.
Before adopting the last resource, viz., œsophagotomy, it is then worth
while to test the action of certain alkaloids, injected subcutaneously,
after having punctured the rumen.
We know that pilocarpine and eserine stimulate secretion and the action
of the bowels. Injected under the skin they cause frequent swallowing
efforts, and intense peristalsis extending throughout the length of the
digestive tract. Doses of 1½ to 2 grains of pilocarpine and 1 to 1½
grains of eserine, according to the size of the animal, sometimes
produce excellent results, and rapidly remove obstructions.
Apomorphine, the effects of which are, so to speak, inverse, because
they tend to produce anti-peristalsis and vomiting, may be tried in
doses of 2 or 3 grains.
=Œsophagotomy.= The last resource is œsophagotomy, which, however, is
only applicable in cases of obstruction of the cervical portion of the
œsophagus. It should be performed as described in the section hereafter
on operative manipulation. (See also Möller and Dollar’s “Regional
Surgery,” p. 166.)
The point selected is necessarily governed by the position of the
obstacle. There is no need to enter into full details. We may remark
that it is not always necessary to perform the complete operation, and
the third and fourth stages can sometimes be avoided by substituting for
them attempts to break down the foreign body by submucous manipulation.
The œsophagus, having been exposed and isolated, is punctured with a
straight tenotome immediately below the obstacle. A curved tenotome is
then introduced, and the root, potato, or fruit divided. As a rule, a
little pressure from the outside then causes one or other of the
fragments to move onwards and deglutition becomes normal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account