Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in EuropeGrellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
History
Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in Europe
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
Romanies
WHEN the Gipseys first arrived in Europe, they had leaders and chiefs, to
conduct the various tribes in their migrations. This was necessary, not
only to facilitate their progress through different countries and
quarters of the globe, but to unite their force if necessary, and thereby
enable them to make a more formidable resistance when opposed: and
likewise to carry any plan, they might have formed, more readily into
execution. We accordingly find, in old books, mention made of knights,
counts, dukes, and kings. Krantz and Munster mention counts, and
knights, in general terms, among the Gipseys; other people give us the
very names of these dignified men: Crusius cites a duke MICHAEL; Muratori
a duke ANDREAS; and Aventinus records a king ZINDELO: not to speak of
inscriptions on monuments, erected in different places, to the memories
of duke PANUEL, count JOHANNIS; and a noble knight PETRUS, in the
fifteenth century. But no comment is requisite to shew how improperly
these appellations were applied. Though the Gipsey chiefs might be
gratified with these titles, and their dependants probably esteemed them
people of rank, it was merely a ridiculous imitation of what they had
seen and admired among civilised people. Nevertheless, the custom of
having leaders and chiefs over them prevails to this time, at least in
Hungary and Transylvania; probably it may also still exist in Turkey, and
other countries where these people live together in great numbers.
Their chiefs—or waywodes, as they proudly call them—were formerly of two
degrees in Hungary. Each petty tribe had its own leader; beside which,
there were four superior waywodes, of their own caste, on both sides the
Danube and Teisse, whose usual residences were at Raab, Lewentz,
Szathmar, and Kaschau: to these the smaller waywodes were accountable.
It would appear extraordinary that any well-regulated state should allow
these people a distinct establishment in the heart of the country, did
not the Hungarian writers assign a reason: viz. that in the commotions
and troubles, occasioned by the Turkish wars, in former centuries, they
were, by means of their waywodes, more easily summoned, when occasion
required, and rendered useful to the community. But the Gipseys in
Hungary and Transylvania were permitted to choose, from their own people,
only the small waywodes of each tribe. The superior waywodes, to whom
the Gipseys, in many districts, were subject, have existed till within a
few years; but they were appointed by the court, and always selected from
the Hungarian nobility. The appointment was by no means despicable; as
each Gipsey was bound to pay the superintendent under whom his tribe was
classed, a guilder annually, of which one half was demanded at Easter,
the other half at Michaelmas. In order to render the levying this tax
more certain, the magistrates, in all towns, cities, and villages, were
ordered to be assisting to the collectors, where necessary; to protect
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account